SECRETARY TO GOVT.. vs E.SURYANARAYANA . — C.A. No. 5727/2008
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010228512008
Filing Date
11-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 5727/2008
Diary Number
22851/2008
Order Date
10-Oct-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SECRETARY TO GOVT..
Adv. G. N. REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.E.SURYANARAYANA .
Adv. C. S. N. MOHAN RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5727/2008
Summary The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's impugned judgment and disposed of consolidated appeals concerning promotion eligibility of Draughtsmen to Supervisor positions under Andhra Pradesh Engineering Subordinate Service Rules. The Court held that the High Court and Tribunal improperly applied an earlier judgment as precedent without examining individual case facts. The Court directed that each respondent submit individual representations within four weeks; authorities must examine these and pass reasoned orders within eight weeks, with eligible candidates receiving all consequential benefits regardless of retirement status, and those found ineligible retaining the right to approach appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts