SECRETARY TO GOVT.. vs E.SURYANARAYANA . — C.A. No. 5727/2008

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010228512008

Filing Date

11-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 5727/2008

Diary Number

22851/2008

Order Date

10-Oct-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SECRETARY TO GOVT..

    Adv. G. N. REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.E.SURYANARAYANA .

    Adv. C. S. N. MOHAN RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 25-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 25-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 21-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 04-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 15-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 03-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 11-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5727/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's impugned judgment and disposed of consolidated appeals concerning promotion eligibility of Draughtsmen to Supervisor positions under Andhra Pradesh Engineering Subordinate Service Rules. The Court held that the High Court and Tribunal improperly applied an earlier judgment as precedent without examining individual case facts. The Court directed that each respondent submit individual representations within four weeks; authorities must examine these and pass reasoned orders within eight weeks, with eligible candidates receiving all consequential benefits regardless of retirement status, and those found ineligible retaining the right to approach appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case