Ajay Kumar THROUGH LRs(Not Applicable) vs Veena Devi AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Rajesh Verma,Vinod Kumar Gupta,Jagmohan Singh Chandel — RSA/298/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010629242024
Filing Number
RSA/51783/2024
Filing Date
30-Nov-2024
Registration No
RSA/298/2024
Registration Date
21-Dec-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajay Kumar THROUGH LRs(Not Applicable)
Adv. Surinder Kumar Saklani
Respondent(s)
-
1.Veena Devi AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Rajesh Verma,Vinod Kumar Gupta,Jagmohan Singh Chandel
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
Summary of RSA 298/2024: The court modified its previous order dated 30.05.2025 to correct a technical error. The original order had deleted the names of legal heirs of deceased respondents from the party array and directed filing of amended memo of parties within four weeks. However, the court clarified that the corrective order regarding RSA No. 298/2024 was inadvertently referenced as RSA No. 295/2024. The order dated 01.06.2026 rectified this clerical mistake, confirming that the same changes apply to RSA No. 298/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
30-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
23-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
30-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/298/2024
Summary of RSA 298/2024: The court modified its previous order dated 30.05.2025 to correct a technical error. The original order had deleted the names of legal heirs of deceased respondents from the party array and directed filing of amended memo of parties within four weeks. However, the court clarified that the corrective order regarding RSA No. 298/2024 was inadvertently referenced as RSA No. 295/2024. The order dated 01.06.2026 rectified this clerical mistake, confirming that the same changes apply to RSA No. 298/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts