Changdeo Vitthal Takale vs Khandu Thakaji Kokare — 550/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140009762024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

18-06-2024

Filing Number

847/2024

Filing Date

18-06-2024

Registration No

550/2024

Registration Date

19-06-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

3-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Newasa

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Changdeo Vitthal Takale

Adv. Joshi N. S.

Vitthal Rakhmaji Takale

Adv. Joshi N. S.

Balasaheb Madhav Dhepe

Adv. Joshi N. S.

Rajanikanth Rambhau Dalvi

Adv. Joshi N. S.

Shivaji Narayan Kokare

Adv. Joshi N. S.

Vasant Machhindra Nangre

Adv. Joshi N. S.

Subhash Muralidhar Nangre G P A Uddhav Subhash Nangre

Adv. Joshi N. S.

Sudhir Kacharu Nangre

Adv. JOSHI NANDKUMAR SADASHIV

Respondent(s)

Khandu Thakaji Kokare

Karbhari Thakaji Kokare

Prakash Khandu Kokare

Eknath Kalyan Bansode

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Newasa

06-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-02-2026

Order on Exh

11-02-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

20-02-2025
Order on T.I.
16-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The civil court granted the petitioner's petition (Petition No. 47 under Civil Suit No. 550/2024) seeking an order to restrain the defendants from obstructing sugarcane harvesting and transportation on a designated road. The court found that the Tahsildar had legally approved the road route, and although the defendants filed an appeal that was partially allowed on 03.02.2025, the petitioner had valid grounds for relief since a parallel alternative route was available to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The civil court granted the petitioner's petition (Petition No. 47 under Civil Suit No. 550/2024) seeking an order to restrain the defendants from obstructing sugarcane harvesting and transportation on a designated road. The court found that the Tahsildar had legally approved the road route, and although the defendants filed an appeal that was partially allowed on 03.02.2025, the petitioner had valid grounds for relief since a parallel alternative route was available to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case