HARSHITH H.R vs PUTTASWAMY P.T — 575/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080011152024
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
591/2024
Filing Date
12-03-2024
Registration No
575/2024
Registration Date
13-03-2024
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARSHITH H.R
Adv. N.BASAVARAJ
Respondent(s)
PUTTASWAMY P.T
THE MANAGER, HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness examination record in a Motor Vehicle Compensation (MVC) case (MVC.575/2024) before the Principal Judge, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. Orthopedic surgeon H.S. Manjunath Bhargava (PW.3) testified on 12.01.2026 regarding his treatment and disability assessment of the petitioner who suffered bilateral leg fractures. During cross-examination, the witness firmly refuted allegations that he exaggerated the 34% disability assessment to suit the petitioner's compensation claim, denying charges that his assessment violated guidelines or that medical records were falsified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness examination record in a Motor Vehicle Compensation (MVC) case (MVC.575/2024) before the Principal Judge, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. Orthopedic surgeon H.S. Manjunath Bhargava (PW.3) testified on 12.01.2026 regarding his treatment and disability assessment of the petitioner who suffered bilateral leg fractures. During cross-examination, the witness firmly refuted allegations that he exaggerated the 34% disability assessment to suit the petitioner's compensation claim, denying charges that his assessment violated guidelines or that medical records were falsified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts