KAMESHWAR PANDEY vs NARAYANAMMA — 8270/2022
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 and R/w Sec 26 of Cpc. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABC010344202022
Filing Number
8264/2022
Filing Date
20-12-2022
Registration No
8270/2022
Registration Date
20-12-2022
Court
PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Judge
2-CCH5 IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSONS JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMESHWAR PANDEY
Adv. PRASANNA D P
RUPA PANDEY
Respondent(s)
NARAYANAMMA
GOPAL M
GURU RAGHAVENDRA SAHAKARI BANK NIYAMITHA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CCH5 IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSONS JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS |
| 18-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness examination transcript (not a final court judgment) in case O.S.8270/2022, conducted in Kannada. The defendant's witness testified on 12.02.2026 regarding property sale agreements involving parties Srinivas and Paddy, with transaction values of ₹2.2 crore and ₹5 crore. The witness provided details about contract signatures, payment of cheques, and involvement in real estate transactions, though claiming limited knowledge of certain transaction details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness examination transcript (not a final court judgment) in case O.S.8270/2022, conducted in Kannada. The defendant's witness testified on 12.02.2026 regarding property sale agreements involving parties Srinivas and Paddy, with transaction values of ₹2.2 crore and ₹5 crore. The witness provided details about contract signatures, payment of cheques, and involvement in real estate transactions, though claiming limited knowledge of certain transaction details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts