RAJENDRA L S vs SUDARSHAN R — 7395/2022

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 and R/w Sec 26 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABC010310822022

Case disposed

Filing Number

7356/2022

Filing Date

17-11-2022

Registration No

7395/2022

Registration Date

17-11-2022

Court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Judge

2-CCH5 IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 and R/w Sec 26 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

RAJENDRA L S

Adv. GOVINDARAJ K JOISA

Respondent(s)

SUDARSHAN R

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CCH5 IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

A.D.R.

02-03-2026

A.D.R.

06-02-2026

A.D.R.

24-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

In O.S. 7395/2022, the court allowed a joint settlement memo between petitioner Rajendra L S and respondent Sudarshan R, whereby the petitioner agreed to accept Rs. 8,70,000 as full and final settlement through two cheques (Rs. 7,00,000 and Rs. 1,70,000). The petitioner undertook to cooperate in cancelling a registered sale agreement dated 11.11.2019 upon realization of the settlement amount, with no further claims against the property. The court directed a decree in accordance with the settlement terms and ordered refund of full court fees to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

23-09-2024
Deposition
25-11-2024
Deposition
20-03-2025
Deposition
18-08-2025
Deposition
20-11-2025
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. 7395/2022, the court allowed a joint settlement memo between petitioner Rajendra L S and respondent Sudarshan R, whereby the petitioner agreed to accept Rs. 8,70,000 as full and final settlement through two cheques (Rs. 7,00,000 and Rs. 1,70,000). The petitioner undertook to cooperate in cancelling a registered sale agreement dated 11.11.2019 upon realization of the settlement amount, with no further claims against the property. The court directed a decree in accordance with the settlement terms and ordered refund of full court fees to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case