Balwinder kaur vs Honey Chauhan — 109/2017

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd January 2019.

Case disposed

MACP - MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM PETITION

CNR: HRPK010028622017

Filing Number

1704/2017

Filing Date

10-Jul-2017

Registration No

109/2017

Registration Date

10-Jul-2017

Court

District and Sessions Court, Panchkula

Judge

16-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Jan-2019

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balwinder kaur

    Adv. Sunidh Kashyap

  2. 2.Miss Manpreet Kaur

    Adv. Sunidh Kashyap

  3. 3.Karanvir Singh

    Adv. Sunidh Kashyap

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Honey Chauhan

  2. 2.Daya Kishan

    Adv. Dinesh Kumar Chopra

  3. 3.Shree Ram General Insurance comapny Ltd.

    Adv. Shital Bindal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Jan-2019

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 23-Jan-2019

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula, partly accepted the compensation claim filed by Smt. Balwinder Kaur and others, holding the vehicle owner (Respondent No. 2) liable to pay the assessed compensation amount while exonerating the insurance company from liability. The tribunal awarded costs in favor of the claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Jan-2019

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 21-Jan-2019

    Copy of orderView PDF

  6. 21-Jan-2019

    Order

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Jan-2019

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  8. 07-Jan-2019

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 14-Dec-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  10. 14-Dec-2018

    Rebuttal Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 04-Dec-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  12. 04-Dec-2018

    Rebuttal Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Nov-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  14. 15-Nov-2018

    Rebuttal Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 29-Oct-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  16. 29-Oct-2018

    Rebuttal Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 08-Oct-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  18. 08-Oct-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 13-Sep-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  20. 13-Sep-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 11-Sep-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  22. 11-Sep-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 28-Aug-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  24. 28-Aug-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 01-Aug-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  26. 01-Aug-2018

    Reply To Objections

    District and Sessions Judge

  27. 16-Jul-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  28. 16-Jul-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  29. 29-May-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  30. 29-May-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 14-May-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  32. 14-May-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 07-May-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  34. 07-May-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 30-Apr-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  36. 30-Apr-2018

    Respondents Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  37. 12-Apr-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  38. 12-Apr-2018

    Petitioners Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  39. 28-Mar-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  40. 28-Mar-2018

    Petitioners Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 06-Mar-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  42. 06-Mar-2018

    Petitioners Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  43. 30-Jan-2018

    Copy of orderView PDF

  44. 30-Jan-2018

    Petitioners Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  45. 06-Jan-2018

    Copy of Interim OrderView PDF

  46. 06-Jan-2018

    Petitioners Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  47. 27-Nov-2017

    Copy of orderView PDF

  48. 27-Nov-2017

    Notice To Respondent

    District and Sessions Judge

  49. 26-Oct-2017

    Copy of orderView PDF

  50. 26-Oct-2017

    Notice To Respondent

    District and Sessions Judge

  51. 03-Oct-2017

    Copy of orderView PDF

  52. 03-Oct-2017

    Notice To Respondent

    District and Sessions Judge

  53. 12-Sep-2017

    Copy of orderView PDF

  54. 12-Sep-2017

    Notice To Respondent

    District and Sessions Judge

  55. 16-Aug-2017

    Copy of orderView PDF

  56. 16-Aug-2017

    Notice To Respondent

    District and Sessions Judge

  57. 10-Jul-2017

    Copy of orderView PDF

  58. 10-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 10-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula, partly accepted the compensation claim filed by Smt. Balwinder Kaur and others, holding the vehicle owner (Respondent No. 2) liable to pay the assessed compensation amount while exonerating the insurance company from liability. The tribunal awarded costs in favor of the claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case