Balwinder kaur vs Honey Chauhan — 109/2017
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd January 2019.
MACP - MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM PETITION
CNR: HRPK010028622017
Filing Number
1704/2017
Filing Date
10-07-2017
Registration No
109/2017
Registration Date
10-07-2017
Court
District and Sessions Court, Panchkula
Judge
16-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23rd January 2019
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balwinder kaur
Adv. Sunidh Kashyap
Miss Manpreet Kaur
Adv. Sunidh Kashyap
Karanvir Singh
Adv. Sunidh Kashyap
Respondent(s)
Honey Chauhan
Daya Kishan
Adv. Dinesh Kumar Chopra
Shree Ram General Insurance comapny Ltd.
Adv. Shital Bindal
Hearing History
Judge: 16-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
ARGUMENTS
REBUTTAL EVIDENCE
REBUTTAL EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-01-2019 | Disposed |
| 21-01-2019 | ORDER |
| 07-01-2019 | ARGUMENTS |
| 14-12-2018 | REBUTTAL EVIDENCE |
| 04-12-2018 | REBUTTAL EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula, partly accepted the compensation claim filed by Smt. Balwinder Kaur and others, holding the vehicle owner (Respondent No. 2) liable to pay the assessed compensation amount while exonerating the insurance company from liability. The tribunal awarded costs in favor of the claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula, partly accepted the compensation claim filed by Smt. Balwinder Kaur and others, holding the vehicle owner (Respondent No. 2) liable to pay the assessed compensation amount while exonerating the insurance company from liability. The tribunal awarded costs in favor of the claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts