Mantri, Surat Labour Union vs Mantri Shri, Sanjivani Hospital, Sanjivani Aarogya Trust Chalthan Advocate - DELETED, J.B.JARIWALA — 11/2012
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Status: For Other evidence of firstparty. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJSR130000842012
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2012
Filing Date
23-03-2012
Registration No
11/2012
Registration Date
23-03-2012
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mantri, Surat Labour Union
Adv. K.H.SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
Mantri Shri, Sanjivani Hospital, Sanjivani Aarogya Trust Chalthan Advocate - DELETED, J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Viren C.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Suresh B.Mehta
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Sunilbhai T.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Bhekhubhai H.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Ishwerbhai G.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Jayeshbhai D.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Hemantbhai J.Nayak
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Manherbhai C.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Tahnshukhbhai J.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Chaotubhai P.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri GamenbhI M.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Shri Koushikbhai N.Patel
Adv. J.B.JARIWALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Other evidence of firstparty
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of first party
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | For Other evidence of firstparty | |
| 30-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party | |
| 23-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party | |
| 16-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the first party's appeal and granted tentative marks to the documents (Case No. 249 of reference No. 22/2012). The court rejected the second party's objections to document authentication, finding them procedurally deficient and dismissing them as dilatory tactics. Consequential orders for document verification and witness examination were issued accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the first party's appeal and granted tentative marks to the documents (Case No. 249 of reference No. 22/2012). The court rejected the second party's objections to document authentication, finding them procedurally deficient and dismissing them as dilatory tactics. Consequential orders for document verification and witness examination were issued accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts