SHREE VARDHAMAN STHANAKVASI JAIN SHARVAK SANGH MULJI NAGAR, vs VIBHUSHAN ESTATE PRIVATE LTD. — HCBM20123772026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020123772026
Filing Number
IA/12377/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHREE VARDHAMAN STHANAKVASI JAIN SHARVAK SANGH MULJI NAGAR,
Adv. SHAKTI DEENGAR
-
2.PARAG CHAMPAKLAL AJMERA
-
3.VIPIN CHANDRA NANDLAL TURKHIYA
-
4.VIPUL VINAYKANT VIRANI
-
5.KANAK BALWANTRAI KHARA
-
6.KIRIT CHHABILDAS SHETH
-
7.PANKAJ CHHABILDAS SHETH
-
8.VINAY CHANDRA KESAVLAL SHAH
-
9.BHADRESH RAMNIKLAL KOTHARI
-
10.DHIRAJLAL KESHAVLAL TURKHIA
-
11.KIRTIKUMAR NANDLAL SHAH
-
12.BHARAT KHODIDAS SHAH
-
13.HEMAL HASMUKH VASANI
-
14.MAHENDRA VADILAL VORA
-
15.PRAFULLA SURESH SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIBHUSHAN ESTATE PRIVATE LTD.
-
2.M/S VEENA SMART CITY LLP
-
3.HARISH N SANGHAVI
-
4.NIKUNJ H SANGHAVI
-
5.PANCHRATNA CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED
-
6.THE CHARITY COMMISSIONER FOR GREATER MUMBAI (MAHARASHTRA STATE)
Case History
-
30-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
Summary The Interim Application is disposed of. The police complaint has been withdrawn, obstructions to the premises have been removed per the previous order, and the developer has invoked arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court clarified that the developer shall not be held responsible for any electricity disconnection by the corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Summary The Interim Application is disposed of. The police complaint has been withdrawn, obstructions to the premises have been removed per the previous order, and the developer has invoked arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court clarified that the developer shall not be held responsible for any electricity disconnection by the corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts