MAYUR L DESAI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUDICIARY — WP/3565/2025

Case under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th October 2025.

CNR: HCBM020115042025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/11502/2025

Filing Date

09-04-2025

Registration No

WP/3565/2025

Registration Date

16-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06th October 2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

MAYUR L DESAI

Adv. CLOVE LEGAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUDICIARY

MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY

Adv. AVADHESH KUMAR

CCI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Adv. WADIA GHANDY AND CO

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

17-04-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

24-04-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

25-04-2025

AT 2.30 P.M.

29-04-2025

AT 2.30 P.M.

30-04-2025

AT 10.30 A.M.

Orders

18-03-2026
04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

This is a procedural order, not a substantive judgment. The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition by mutual consent to 16 June 2026 for hearing in the Urgent Supplementary Board, and placed affidavits in reply and sur-rejoinder on record. No decision on merits has been rendered yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a procedural order, not a substantive judgment. The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition by mutual consent to 16 June 2026 for hearing in the Urgent Supplementary Board, and placed affidavits in reply and sur-rejoinder on record. No decision on merits has been rendered yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case