NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DEV. CORP. THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR vs ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX — C.A. No. 4614/2014

Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010073582012

Filing Date

29-Feb-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 4614/2014

Diary Number

7358/2012

Order Date

10-Dec-2025

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [other than matters covered by categories 1602-1605] Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DEV. CORP. THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) CHRISTI JAIN[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR MADHULIKA UPADHYAY[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Dec-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  3. 24-Jul-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  4. 23-Jul-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  5. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Feb-2013
  8. 13-Aug-2012
  9. 04-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Feb-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4614/2014

  11. [ 2025 INSC 1414 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 4612/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court dismissed NCDC's appeals, holding that dividend income on redeemable preference shares, interest on short-term bank deposits, and service charges on Sugar Development Fund loans do not qualify for the 40% deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act. The Court interpreted "profits derived from the business of providing long-term finance" strictly, requiring direct nexus with long-term lending (loans/advances repayable over 5+ years), and excluded ancillary income streams and passive investments from the deduction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case