NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX — C.A. No. 4612/2014
Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010071932012
Filing Date
28-Feb-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 4612/2014
Diary Number
7193/2012
Order Date
10-Dec-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2025 INSC 1414
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) CHRISTI JAIN[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Adv. MADHULIKA UPADHYAY[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Dec-2025
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
24-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
23-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
11-Jun-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jun-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale
-
15-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
18-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4612/2014
-
[ 2025 INSC 1414 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary The Supreme Court dismissed NCDC's appeals, holding that dividend income on preference shares, interest on short-term bank deposits, and service charges on Sugar Development Fund loans do not qualify for the 40% deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court interpreted "profits derived from the business of providing long-term finance" narrowly, requiring a direct, first-degree nexus with long-term lending activity, thereby excluding ancillary income streams regardless of operational integration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts