STATE OF JAMMU CIVIL SECRETARIAT COMMISSIONER vs M/S.R.C.FLOUR MILLS . — C.A. No. 9846/2011

Case under Section XI-B. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010007052006

DISPOSED

Filing Date

04-01-2006 03:15 PM

Registration No

C.A. No. 9846/2011

Diary Number

705/2006

Order Date

18-08-2017

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF JAMMU CIVIL SECRETARIAT COMMISSIONER

Adv. M. SHOEB ALAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) M. SHOEB ALAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-2] SUNIL FERNANDES (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

M/S.R.C.FLOUR MILLS .

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

18-08-2017

Fixed Date by Court

09-08-2017

Fixed Date by Court

Orders in this case

[ 2017 INSC 771 ] Judgement - of Main Case
11-03-2016 ROP
11-03-2016 ROP
14-12-2015 ROP
14-12-2015 ROP
17-09-2015 ROP
17-09-2015 ROP
13-04-2015 ROP
13-04-2015 ROP
27-10-2014 ROP
05-09-2014 ROP
05-09-2014 ROP
21-07-2014 ROP
28-04-2014 ROP
10-03-2014 ROP
07-02-2014 ROP
15-01-2014 ROP
23-10-2013 ROP
10-09-2013 ROP
30-07-2013 ROP
09-04-2013 ROP
29-10-2012 ROP
18-07-2012 ROP
28-02-2011 ROP
10-11-2010 ROP
09-07-2010 ROP
23-04-2010 ROP
23-03-2010 ROP
22-02-2010 ROP
12-01-2010 ROP
30-11-2009 ROP
17-08-2009 ROP
01-10-2008 ROP
17-07-2007 ROP
30-03-2007 ROP
09-02-2007 ROP
18-08-2006 ROP
19-07-2006 ROP
03-04-2006 ROP

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 9844/2011

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Jammu & Kashmir v. Trikuta Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. Outcome: Supreme Court allowed the State's appeals and set aside the High Court's order. The Court upheld the State's 1993 policy decision capping central sales tax (CST) refunds to small-scale industrial units at Rs. 2 lacs per annum, rejecting claims based on promissory estoppel. The Court clarified that previously granted refunds need not be withdrawn or repaid. Key Reasoning: The Court held that CST refunds are executive policy concessions with no indefeasible legal right. Fraudulent claims, misuse of exemptions, and erosion of State finances justified the policy modification without being arbitrary. Next Steps: No further hearings scheduled; judgment is final. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case