STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE OF JAMMU INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT. CIVIL SECRETATIAT COMMISSIONER vs M/S.TRIKUTA ROLLER FLOUR MILLS.P.LTD — C.A. No. 9844/2011

Case under Section XI-B. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010006992006

DISPOSED

Filing Date

04-01-2006 03:10 PM

Registration No

C.A. No. 9844/2011

Diary Number

699/2006

Order Date

18-08-2017

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 771

Disposal Type

Allowed

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE OF JAMMU INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT. CIVIL SECRETATIAT COMMISSIONER

Adv. M. SHOEB ALAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SUNIL FERNANDES (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

M/S.TRIKUTA ROLLER FLOUR MILLS.P.LTD

Adv. ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-2]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

18-08-2017

Fixed Date by Court

18-08-2017

Fixed Date by Court

09-08-2017

Fixed Date by Court

27-07-2017

Administrative Order

Orders

[ 2017 INSC 771 ] Judgement - of Main Case
11-03-2016 ROP
11-03-2016 ROP
14-12-2015 ROP
14-12-2015 ROP
17-09-2015 ROP
17-09-2015 ROP
13-04-2015 ROP
13-04-2015 ROP
27-10-2014 ROP
05-09-2014 ROP
05-09-2014 ROP
21-07-2014 ROP
28-04-2014 ROP
10-03-2014 ROP
07-02-2014 ROP
15-01-2014 ROP
23-10-2013 ROP
10-09-2013 ROP
30-07-2013 ROP
09-04-2013 ROP
29-10-2012 ROP
18-07-2012 ROP
28-02-2011 ROP
10-11-2010 ROP
09-07-2010 ROP
23-04-2010 ROP
23-03-2010 ROP
22-02-2010 ROP
12-01-2010 ROP
30-11-2009 ROP
17-08-2009 ROP
01-10-2008 ROP
17-07-2007 ROP
30-03-2007 ROP
09-02-2007 ROP
18-08-2006 ROP
19-07-2006 ROP
03-04-2006 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of State of Jammu & Kashmir v. Trikuta Roller Flour Mills (2017) The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeals, setting aside the High Court's order that had invalidated a 1993 policy restricting Central Sales Tax (CST) refunds to small-scale industrial units. The Court held that the State had valid grounds to modify its earlier refund policy due to fraudulent claims and revenue erosion, and that judicial review of executive economic policy should be limited to arbitrariness or unreasonableness. However, the Court clarified that benefits already granted and availed cannot be withdrawn, protecting vested rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case