STATE OF KARNATAKA . vs SRI PUTTAPPA(DEAD) BY LRS. . — C.A. No. 2238/2006

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010059172005

Filing Date

14-Mar-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 2238/2006

Diary Number

5917/2005

Order Date

25-Jul-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI PUTTAPPA(DEAD) BY LRS. .

    Adv. NAVEEN R. NATH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 21-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 25-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-Mar-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2238/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 2238/2006 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals filed by the State of Karnataka on July 25, 2013, with no costs awarded. The Court upheld the applicability of Rule 247-A of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958, allowing daily wagers' prior service to count toward qualifying service for retiral benefits upon regularization. Key Finding: The Court rejected Karnataka's argument that respondents were employed on work-charged establishments (which would have excluded them from Rule 247-A benefits). Since the State's own petitions consistently claimed respondents were daily wagers—never alleging work-charged status—the Court found no basis to exclude Rule 247-A's protection. Procedural Orders: Delays in filing substitution applications in related Special Leave Petitions were condoned, and leave was granted in all connected petitions before dismissing them in terms of the signed order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case