M/S. GHCL LTD. vs M/S. ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO.(I)LTD. — SLP(C) No. 4317/2005

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010042262005

Filing Date

22-Feb-2005

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 4317/2005

Diary Number

4226/2005

Order Date

08-Apr-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. GHCL LTD.

    Adv. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO.(I)LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 28-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 4317/2005

casestatus.in Summary

GHCL Ltd. v. Asset Reconstruction Co. (I) Ltd. — SLP(C) 4317/2005 On 08/04/2005, the Supreme Court heard GHCL Ltd.'s special leave petition challenging the High Court of Bombay's order (dated 15/02/2005) in a writ petition. GHCL contended that the High Court erred by accepting respondents' claim that they exercised rights under Section 172 of the Contract Act rather than the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets Act, 2002, and argued the respondents' rejection decision was arbitrary and deviated from their prescribed selection process. The Supreme Court observed that while GHCL's first argument was addressed by the High Court, the arbitrariness claim was not reflected in the High Court's order, though an affidavit confirmed it was argued before the learned judge. The Court disposed of the petition, suggesting GHCL may file an appropriate application before the High Court to address this overlooked argument, while expressing no opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case