NISTALA VENKATARAMANAMMA (D) BY LRS. vs JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM . — SLP(C) No. 8915/2004
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010041462004
Filing Date
21-Feb-2004
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 8915/2004
Diary Number
4146/2004
Order Date
01-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NISTALA VENKATARAMANAMMA (D) BY LRS.
Adv. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM .
Adv. C. K. SUCHARITA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2004
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 8915/2004
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 8915/2004 On 01/10/2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by Nistala Venkataramanamma's successors against the Collector, Visakhapatnam. The petitioners had challenged the High Court's dismissal of their land grabbing relief claim under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, which the High Court had deemed premature because the land was declared a slum area and proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 were pending. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, directing the appropriate authority to examine whether pending proceedings under the Urban Land Act could be concluded, and permitting parties to approach relevant authorities under applicable land and slum improvement legislation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts