JAMBULLA RAVINDRA REDDY @ MADAN.M.REDDY vs JAMBULA RAGHUNANDAN REDDY . — SLP(C) No. 4071/2007
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010036292007
Filing Date
03-Feb-2007
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 4071/2007
Diary Number
3629/2007
Order Date
16-Mar-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAMBULLA RAVINDRA REDDY @ MADAN.M.REDDY
Adv. SRIDHAR POTARAJU (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAMBULA RAGHUNANDAN REDDY .
Adv. D. BHARATHI REDDY VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2007
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 4071/2007
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 004071/2007 On 16 March 2012, the Supreme Court heard the petition challenging the High Court of A.P.'s judgment dated 15 September 2005. The parties filed a Memo of Understanding dated 21 January 2012 settling all disputes between them (excluding proforma respondents 7 and 8). The Court found the compromise legal and acceptable, condoned the delay in filing, and disposed of the petition as settled. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts