NOIDA ENTREPRENEURS ASSOCN. vs N O I D A — W.P.(C) No. 150/1997

Case under Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010035011997

Filing Date

21-Feb-1997

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 150/1997

Diary Number

3501/1997

Order Date

30-Nov-2015

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section PIL-W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NOIDA ENTREPRENEURS ASSOCN.

    Adv. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N O I D A

    Adv. ADARSH UPADHYAY BHARTI TYAGI JOGY SCARIA PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH SANGEETA KUMAR SUDHANSU PALO P. N. PURI FOX MANDAL & CO. (Dead / Retired / Elevated) LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH P. PARMESWARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 30-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 02-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 26-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 26-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Nov-2013

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 05-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 13-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 31-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 22-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 23-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 24-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 24-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 03-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 09-May-2011

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 29-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 29-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 29-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 09-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 02-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 15-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 31-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 09-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 08-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 13-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 29-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 15-Jan-2007

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 15-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 11-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 09-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 28-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 11-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 31-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 30-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 10-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 22-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 01-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 28-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 09-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 11-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 14-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 20-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 03-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 25-Oct-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  58. 22-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 21-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 19-Jan-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 21-Feb-1997

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 150/1997

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

On 30/11/2015, the Supreme Court heard I.A. No. 67 of 2015 in NOIDA Entrepreneurs Association v. NOIDA. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the application with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies independently. The Court disposed of the application as withdrawn and directed the Registry not to accept any further applications in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case