KAKARLA NAGESWARA RAO vs M.L. NARULLA . — SLP(Crl) No. 1303/2005

Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010033102005

Filing Date

11-Feb-2005

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 1303/2005

Diary Number

3310/2005

Order Date

15-May-2008

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAKARLA NAGESWARA RAO

    Adv. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.L. NARULLA .

    Adv. GAGRAT AND CO D. BHARATHI REDDY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 20-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 01-May-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 03-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 28-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 1303/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 15/05/2008, the Supreme Court heard SLP(Crl) No. 1303/2005 and approved a settlement between petitioner Kakarla Nageswara Rao and respondents M.L. Narulla and others. The respondents paid Rs. 22,00,000 to the petitioner via demand draft, and the petitioner withdrew the Special Leave Petition and agreed to withdraw civil suit O.S. No. 284 of 2005 pending before the District Judge at Guntur relating to 25.04 acres of land at Kaza Mines. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and both parties undertook not to make any further claims against each other. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case