H.S. NATARAJ(DEAD) BY LRS. vs CHINNAMMA — C.A. No. 7111 - 7112/2000
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010032471999
Filing Date
23-Feb-1999
Registration No
C.A. No. 7111 - 7112/2000
Diary Number
3247/1999
Order Date
18-Mar-2009
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.H.S. NATARAJ(DEAD) BY LRS.
Adv. NAVEEN R. NATH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHINNAMMA
Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2000
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-1999
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7111 - 7112/2000
Case Summary: C.A. No. 007111-007112/2000 On 18 March 2009, the Supreme Court partially allowed the appeals filed by H.S. Nataraj's legal representatives. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment regarding property items 2 and 3, finding the High Court failed to provide reasoned findings on substantial questions of law before allowing the plaintiff's appeals. The Court remitted the matter back to the High Court for reconsideration and final decision on the merits of items 2 and 3 within six months, while upholding the High Court's decision regarding property item 1. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts