LAXMINARAYAN (D) TH:LRS . vs INDORE DEV. AUTHORITY . — C.A. No. 2745 - 2753/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010295212008

Filing Date

13-Oct-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 2745 - 2753/2010

Diary Number

29521/2008

Order Date

17-Mar-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAXMINARAYAN (D) TH:LRS .

    Adv. NIRAJ SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDORE DEV. AUTHORITY .

    Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SANJAY KAPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 19-Feb-2010
  5. 04-Dec-2009
  6. 06-Nov-2009
  7. 23-Oct-2009
  8. 15-Sep-2009
  9. 17-Aug-2009
  10. 10-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 09-Jul-2009
  12. 23-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Feb-2009
  16. 16-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Jan-2009
  18. 01-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-Oct-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2745 - 2753/2010

  20. 15-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 26-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 18-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 14-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 06-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 07-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 09-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 01-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 002745-002753/2010 The Supreme Court allowed appeals by land claimants (Laxminarayan LRS and others) against the Indore Development Authority regarding compensation for land acquired in 1978 for a Sabzi Mandi. The High Court had awarded Rs. 50,000 per acre uniformly; the Court set aside this judgment and remanded to the High Court for reconsideration of market value, directing it to consider the claimants' pending application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and the precedent decision in Yogini (which awarded higher compensation for nearby land acquired four years earlier). The High Court was requested to dispose expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case