P. RAJANNA vs K. LALITHA REDDY @ CHINNAMADEVI . — C.A. No. 2287/2006

On 20 April 2010, the Supreme Court allowed P. Rajanna's appeal against the High Court's judgment dated 10 November 2004. The Court found that respondent-landlords deliberately demolished the disputed building to prevent restitution after the High Court's 1995 judgment had set aside an eviction decree and ordered the tenant's restoration to possession. The Court directed immediate restoration of land possession to the appellant and ordered the Munsif-cum-Rent Control Authority to assess the demolished building's value within eight weeks, with respondents directed to compensate the tenant within six weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.