S.K. SUVARNA vs HEMAN KUMAR TAURANI — Crl.A. No. 1704/2010

Case under Section II. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010268382004

DISPOSED

Filing Date

08-Dec-2004

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1704/2010

Diary Number

26838/2004

Order Date

13-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Data as of 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

S.K. SUVARNA

Adv. PRAMOD B. AGARWALA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

HEMAN KUMAR TAURANI

Adv. S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-1]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

13-Jul-2017

Ordinary

12-Jul-2017

Ordinary

11-Jul-2017

Ordinary

Orders

16-Feb-2015 ROP
16-Feb-2015 ROP
06-Jan-2015 ROP
06-Jan-2015 ROP
21-Nov-2014 ROP
01-Feb-2013 ROP
03-Jan-2013 ROP
27-Nov-2012 ROP
17-Nov-2008 ROP
26-Sep-2008 ROP
21-Aug-2008 ROP
22-Apr-2008 ROP
24-Mar-2008 ROP
03-Mar-2008 ROP
07-Feb-2008 ROP
28-Nov-2007 ROP
22-Oct-2007 ROP
26-Sep-2007 ROP
16-May-2007 ROP
05-Apr-2007 ROP
05-Apr-2007 ROP
29-Sep-2006 ROP
21-Aug-2006 ROP
12-May-2005 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: S.K. Suvarna v. Heman Kumar Taurani (Crl.A. 1704/2010) The Supreme Court allowed S.K. Suvarna's appeal and quashed criminal proceedings against him arising from Criminal Complaint No. 720 of 2003 (filed under IPC Section 500 for alleged defamatory remarks in a written statement). While the High Court had partly quashed proceedings against 12 co-accused, it dismissed Suvarna's petition solely because he signed the statement on behalf of Bank of Baroda. The Supreme Court found the matter was 12 years old with an interim stay since 2005, and the complainant had abandoned similar proceedings against other accused in 2016, demonstrating lack of prosecution interest. The Court held no purpose would be served in continuing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case