ABDUL RAHIM vs SHAHID IQUBAL KHAN . — Crl.A. No. 933/2011

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010256452007

Filing Date

05-Sep-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 933/2011

Diary Number

25645/2007

Order Date

25-Feb-2015

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL RAHIM

    Adv. HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAHID IQUBAL KHAN .

    Adv. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA GOPAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Feb-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 19-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 01-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 23-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 07-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 07-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 05-Sep-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 933/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 933/2011 The Supreme Court dismissed Abdul Rahim's appeal on 25 February 2015. Rahim challenged a High Court order that quashed cognizance taken by a trial magistrate in Complaint Case No. 247C of 2000 under IPC Sections 323, 504, and Representation of People Act Section 135A against Shahid Iqbal Khan (the Returning Officer). The Court found no material evidence supported Rahim's allegations—he claimed to be a BJP polling agent beaten by Khan, but provided no medical reports or supporting documentation. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that the complaint was frivolous, filed as a counter-complaint to obstruct an FIR registered by the Presiding Officer regarding booth disruptions by Rahim's brother, and constituted abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case