THE STATE OF PUNJAB SECRETARY vs DAVINDER SINGH — C.A. No. 2317/2011

Case under 4301_3Jj-service Laws : Three Judge Matter Section IV. Status: PENDING.

CNR: SCIN010255362010

PENDING

Filing Date

13-Aug-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 2317/2011

Diary Number

25536/2010

Order Date

01-Aug-2024

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2020 INSC 512, 2024 INSC 562

Data as of 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

4301_3jj-Service Laws : Three Judge Matter Section IV

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF PUNJAB SECRETARY

Adv. DEVYANI GUPTA[P-3] ANIS AHMED KHAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-3] R. D. UPADHYAY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-3] KARAN SHARMA[P-1] KARAN SHARMA[P-2]

Respondent(s)

DAVINDER SINGH

Adv. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-1] SATYENDRA KUMAR[R-3] SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-2] NARESH BAKSHI[R-1]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

07-Nov-2024

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

06-Nov-2024

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

01-Aug-2024

Fixed Date by Court

08-Feb-2024

Fixed Date by Court

07-Feb-2024

Fixed Date by Court

Orders in this case

01-Aug-2024 Judgement - of Main Case
[ 2024 INSC 562 ] Judgement - of Main Case
01-Aug-2024 ROP - of Main Case
08-Feb-2024 ROP - of Main Case
07-Feb-2024 ROP - of Main Case
06-Feb-2024 ROP - of Main Case
12-Oct-2023 ROP - of Main Case
10-Aug-2022 ROP - of Main Case
11-May-2022 ROP - of Main Case
27-Aug-2020 ROP - of Main Case
27-Aug-2020 Judgement - of Main Case
16-Jul-2020 ROP - of Main Case
15-Jul-2020 ROP - of Main Case
27-Feb-2020 ROP - of Main Case
11-Feb-2020 ROP - of Main Case
04-Feb-2020 ROP - of Main Case
17-Oct-2019 ROP - of Main Case
11-Sep-2019 ROP - of Main Case
03-May-2016 ROP
03-May-2016 Office Report
03-May-2016 ROP
17-Mar-2016 ROP - of Main Case
17-Mar-2016 Office Report - of Main Case
17-Mar-2016 ROP - of Main Case
18-Feb-2016 ROP
18-Feb-2016 Office Report
08-Feb-2016 ROP - of Main Case
08-Feb-2016 Office Report - of Main Case
08-Feb-2016 ROP - of Main Case
01-Feb-2016 ROP
01-Feb-2016 Office Report
01-Feb-2016 ROP
10-Dec-2015 ROP
10-Dec-2015 Office Report
10-Dec-2015 ROP
30-Nov-2015 ROP
30-Nov-2015 Office Report
30-Nov-2015 ROP
03-Nov-2015 ROP
03-Nov-2015 ROP
14-Oct-2015 ROP
14-Oct-2015 Office Report
14-Oct-2015 ROP
04-Sep-2015 ROP
04-Sep-2015 ROP
28-Aug-2015 ROP
28-Aug-2015 ROP
10-Aug-2015 ROP
10-Aug-2015 ROP
04-Aug-2015 ROP
04-Aug-2015 ROP
30-Mar-2015 ROP
27-Mar-2015 Office Report
26-Feb-2015 ROP - of Main Case
26-Feb-2015 ROP - of Main Case
02-Feb-2015 ROP
02-Feb-2015 ROP
15-Dec-2014 ROP
15-Dec-2014 ROP
26-Sep-2014 ROP
26-Sep-2014 ROP
20-Aug-2014 ROP
13-Aug-2014 ROP
06-Aug-2014 Office Report
31-Jul-2014 Office Report - of Main Case
31-Jul-2014 Office Report
31-Jul-2014 ROP - of Main Case
30-Apr-2014 ROP - of Main Case
02-Apr-2014 ROP
31-Mar-2014 ROP
25-Mar-2014 Office Report - of Main Case
25-Feb-2014 ROP - of Main Case
06-Feb-2014 ROP - of Main Case
22-Jan-2014 ROP - of Main Case
16-Jan-2014 ROP
15-Jan-2014 ROP - of Main Case
15-Jan-2014 ROP - of Main Case
10-Jan-2014 Office Report
10-Jan-2014 ROP
21-Nov-2013 ROP - of Main Case
21-Nov-2013 ROP
22-Oct-2013 Office Report - of Main Case
17-Oct-2013 ROP
20-Sep-2013 ROP - of Main Case
16-Aug-2013 ROP
07-Aug-2013 ROP
02-Jul-2013 ROP
18-Apr-2013 ROP
03-Apr-2013 ROP
02-Apr-2013 ROP
21-Feb-2013 ROP
12-Feb-2013 ROP
10-Jan-2013 ROP
14-Dec-2012 ROP
06-Nov-2012 ROP
17-Oct-2012 ROP
08-Oct-2012 ROP - of Main Case
26-Sep-2012 ROP - of Main Case
21-Sep-2012 ROP
05-Sep-2012 ROP
09-Aug-2012 ROP - of Main Case
08-Aug-2012 ROP
17-Jul-2012 ROP
17-Jul-2012 ROP
16-Jul-2012 ROP
03-Jul-2012 ROP
03-May-2012 ROP
12-Apr-2012 ROP
02-Apr-2012 ROP
02-Mar-2012 ROP
21-Feb-2012 ROP
23-Jan-2012 ROP
14-Dec-2011 ROP - of Main Case
09-Dec-2011 ROP
28-Nov-2011 ROP
25-Nov-2011 ROP - of Main Case
18-Nov-2011 ROP
04-Nov-2011 ROP - of Main Case
20-Oct-2011 ROP
27-Sep-2011 ROP - of Main Case
21-Sep-2011 ROP
19-Sep-2011 ROP
13-Sep-2011 ROP
18-Aug-2011 ROP
09-Aug-2011 ROP
29-Jul-2011 ROP
25-Jul-2011 ROP
18-Jul-2011 ROP
15-Jul-2011 ROP
06-Jul-2011 ROP
12-May-2011 ROP
11-May-2011 ROP
09-May-2011 ROP
02-May-2011 ROP
07-Apr-2011 ROP
11-Mar-2011 ROP
07-Mar-2011 ROP - of Main Case
01-Mar-2011 ROP - of Main Case
18-Feb-2011 ROP
10-Feb-2011 ROP
27-Jan-2011 ROP
05-Jan-2011 ROP
13-Dec-2010 ROP
03-Dec-2010 ROP
15-Nov-2010 ROP
15-Nov-2010 ROP - of Main Case
08-Nov-2010 ROP
21-Oct-2010 ROP - of Main Case
01-Oct-2010 ROP
10-Sep-2010 ROP
30-Aug-2010 ROP - of Main Case
30-Jul-2010 ROP
26-Jul-2010 ROP
12-Jul-2010 ROP
06-Jul-2010 ROP
08-Jun-2010 ROP
04-May-2010 ROP
27-Apr-2010 ROP
09-Mar-2010 ROP
13-Jan-2010 ROP
03-Dec-2009 ROP
13-Nov-2009 ROP
21-Oct-2009 ROP
14-Sep-2009 ROP
11-Sep-2009 ROP
18-Aug-2009 ROP
28-Jul-2009 ROP
23-Jul-2009 ROP
13-Jul-2009 ROP
12-May-2009 ROP
24-Apr-2009 ROP
25-Mar-2009 ROP
24-Mar-2009 ROP
20-Mar-2009 ROP
12-Dec-2008 ROP
11-Nov-2008 ROP
19-Sep-2008 ROP
02-Sep-2008 ROP
12-Aug-2008 ROP
07-Jul-2008 ROP
21-Apr-2008 ROP
08-Apr-2008 ROP
25-Jan-2008 ROP
25-Jan-2008 ROP
25-Jan-2008 ROP
28-Sep-2007 ROP
13-Aug-2007 ROP
02-Mar-2007 ROP
12-Dec-2006 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024) Case Citation: C.A. No. 2317/2011 | 2024 INSC 562 Key Decision: The Supreme Court (7-Judge Constitution Bench) held that sub-classification of Scheduled Castes for reservation purposes is constitutionally permissible, overruling the prior judgment in E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh. Core Holding: Sub-classification within Scheduled Castes does not violate Articles 14, 15, 16, or 341 of the Constitution, provided it is based on empirical data demonstrating inter-se backwardness and inadequate representation of the sub-group, and does not exclude any caste from the Presidential List. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case