. COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GEN.OF INDIA vs PRADEEP DESHMUKH — C.A. No. 7505 - 7511/2012

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010241212008

Filing Date

22-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 7505 - 7511/2012

Diary Number

24121/2008

Order Date

02-May-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.. COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GEN.OF INDIA

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEP DESHMUKH

    Adv. NIRAJ SHARMA SUSHMA SURI[R-15] SUSHMA SURI[R-15] SUSHMA SURI[R-18] SUSHMA SURI[R-11] SUSHMA SURI[R-12] SUSHMA SURI[R-12]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-May-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  4. 11-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Aug-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Jan-2011
  9. 18-Nov-2010
  10. 28-Sep-2010
  11. 05-Jan-2010
  12. 30-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 26-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 11-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 16-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 28-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 22-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7505 - 7511/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Supreme Court dismissed the Comptroller and Auditor General's appeals challenging the grant of special allowances and higher pay scales to respondent employees. The Court upheld lower courts' findings that while special allowances for assigned tasks can justify higher pay for junior employees, such grants must follow objective criteria applied uniformly to all similarly-situated employees, not be based on arbitrary officer discretion. The Court directed financial implications of the orders be remitted to respondents within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case