RULDU vs RISALA (D) BY LRS.. — C.A. No. 2571/2012

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010223252008

Filing Date

06-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 2571/2012

Diary Number

22325/2008

Order Date

28-Feb-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RULDU

    Adv. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RISALA (D) BY LRS..

    Adv. BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI K. SARADA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 01-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 05-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2571/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 002571/2012 (RULDU v. RISALA) The Supreme Court allowed RULDU's appeal and set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment dated 5.10.2007, which had reversed the first appellate court's decision in a land ownership dispute. The Court found the High Court failed to frame a substantial question of law as mandatorily required under Section 100 of the CPC before reversing trial court findings. Next step: Matter remanded to High Court for fresh disposal after properly framing the substantial question of law, with a six-month deadline. Respondents may apply for interim relief before the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case