RULDU vs RISALA (D) BY LRS.. — C.A. No. 2571/2012
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010223252008
Filing Date
06-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 2571/2012
Diary Number
22325/2008
Order Date
28-Feb-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RULDU
Adv. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY
Respondent(s)
-
1.RISALA (D) BY LRS..
Adv. BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI K. SARADA DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2571/2012
Summary of C.A. No. 002571/2012 (RULDU v. RISALA) The Supreme Court allowed RULDU's appeal and set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment dated 5.10.2007, which had reversed the first appellate court's decision in a land ownership dispute. The Court found the High Court failed to frame a substantial question of law as mandatorily required under Section 100 of the CPC before reversing trial court findings. Next step: Matter remanded to High Court for fresh disposal after properly framing the substantial question of law, with a six-month deadline. Respondents may apply for interim relief before the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts