U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs RATAN SINGH . — SLP(C) No. 23246/2010

Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010221552010

Filing Date

19-Jul-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 23246/2010

Diary Number

22155/2010

Order Date

14-Sep-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW

    Adv. VISHWAJIT SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATAN SINGH .

    Adv. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Jul-2012
  6. 27-Apr-2012
  7. 10-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 21-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 27-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Sep-2011
  14. 19-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Nov-2010
  17. 01-Oct-2010
  18. 16-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-Aug-2010
  20. 09-Aug-2010
  21. 19-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 23246/2010

  22. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 023246/2010 U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Ratan Singh The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's special leave petitions challenging the Allahabad High Court's approval of enhanced land compensation. The petitioner had acquired respondents' land for the Hathras development scheme at Rs. 9.68 per sq. yard; the Reference Court increased this to Rs. 100 per sq. yard based on contemporary sale deeds and market evidence. Finding the Reference Court's reasoning sound, the Supreme Court directed the petitioner to pay the balance compensation within three months along with statutory benefits including 30% solatium, 12% additional compensation, and interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case