KRISHNA DEVI vs NARESH KUMAR — C.A. No. 8295/2010
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010219412008
Filing Date
02-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 8295/2010
Diary Number
21941/2008
Order Date
14-Aug-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHNA DEVI
Adv. USHA NANDINI V.
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARESH KUMAR
Adv. SUSMITA LAL KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
08-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
22-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8295/2010
Case Summary: C.A. No. 008295/2010 (Krishna Devi v. Naresh Kumar) Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside removal directions against the appellants and disposed of the appeals. The Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to allow the four surviving appellants to continue working with the respondent Bank until retirement, finding that ~20 years had elapsed since their compassionate appointments in 1999-2000 and one appellant had only two years left to retire, making removal unjust despite qualification concerns for promotions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts