DEEPAK KUMAR ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. — SLP(C) No. 19628 - 19629/2009
Case under Section IV-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010203082009
Filing Date
13-Jul-2009
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 19628 - 19629/2009
Diary Number
20308/2009
Order Date
22-Jan-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK KUMAR ETC.
Adv. TARUN GUPTA[P-1] RAJESH SINGH[P-1] HARSH V. SURANA[P-1] S. K. DHINGRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] GAURAV KEJRIWAL[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.
Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1] E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-1] [Gr] KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1] [Gr] BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1] PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1] M. T. GEORGE[R-1] T. MAHIPAL[R-1] SHREE PAL SINGH[R-1] KULDIP SINGH[R-1] IRSHAD AHMAD[R-1] SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1] PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1] P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-1] SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL[R-1] MILIND KUMAR[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jan-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
06-Jan-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2020
Mention Memo
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
16-May-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
11-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2012
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 19628 - 19629/2009
Summary of SLP(C) No. 19628-19629/2009 Deepak Kumar v. State of Haryana (Heard: 22-01-2021) The Supreme Court disposed of the main special leave petitions (SLP Nos. 19628-19629/2009) as infructuous after petitioners' counsel stated they had become infructuous. All pending interlocutory applications were also dismissed, though applicants retained liberty to file independent proceedings. Several related matters were disposed of as withdrawn or dismissed for non-prosecution, while others were adjourned for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts