G.V. KALAVATHI (DEAD) BY LRS vs T. SARASWATHI PRASAD SINGH . — C.A. No. 10266/2010
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010191732003
Filing Date
15-Sep-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 10266/2010
Diary Number
19173/2003
Order Date
02-Dec-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G.V. KALAVATHI (DEAD) BY LRS
Adv. A. SUBBA RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.T. SARASWATHI PRASAD SINGH .
Adv. DINESH KUMAR GARG
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 10266/2010
Summary of Civil Appeal No. 10266 of 2010 On 2 December 2010, the Supreme Court heard the appeal by G.V. Kalavathi (deceased, represented by legal representatives) against T. Saraswathi Prasad Singh and others, arising from a High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment. The Court granted leave to appeal and disposed of the case partially through compromise: the appeals against respondents 1, 3, and 4 were disposed of in terms of a compromise memo dated 7-9 July 2008, with a decree issued accordingly; the appeals against respondents 5, 6, and 7 were dismissed as the appellants did not wish to press them. No order as to costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts