HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs RAJESH JINDAL — C.A. No. 7821/2004

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010018222004

Filing Date

22-Jan-2004

Registration No

C.A. No. 7821/2004

Diary Number

1822/2004

Order Date

08-Mar-2004

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH JINDAL

    Adv. SATISH AGGARWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Jan-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7821/2004

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 007821/2004 On March 8, 2004, the Supreme Court heard multiple Special Leave Petitions filed by Haryana Urban Development Authority against Rajesh Jindal, arising from a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission order dated October 23, 2003. The Court issued notice on the main SLP (No. 3753/2004) and tagged it with an earlier related petition. For certain SLPs, the Court granted four weeks to file better affidavits explaining the delay in filing. Notably, Civil Appeal No. D1940/2004 was dismissed due to an inordinate delay of 634 days, with the Court finding no proper explanation for the delay and accordingly dismissing the application for condonation of delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case