STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR vs H.S. SAHNI . — C.A. No. 8269/2001

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010167951999

Filing Date

15-Oct-1999

Registration No

C.A. No. 8269/2001

Diary Number

16795/1999

Order Date

25-Aug-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.S. SAHNI .

    Adv. RR-EX-PARTE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 24-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 07-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 29-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 15-Oct-1999

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8269/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Jammu & Kashmir v. H.S. Sahni Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of both interim applications (IA Nos. 11 & 12) on August 25, 2005, clarifying its previous order dated February 16, 2004. The Court affirmed that recruitment rules must operate with Note 3 deleted (which prescribed a 1:3 ratio between degree and diploma holders for Junior Engineer appointments). The Court explicitly directed that the State Government cannot recruit based on Note 3 in any manner whatsoever. Key Points: The High Court had struck down Note 3 as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court's order declining to pass further directions in the appeal (September 4, 2003) was clarified to mean the existing amended rules (post-January 9, 2004 notification deleting Note 3) would continue, with no recruitment allowed under the invalidated provision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case