K.P. CHANDRAN . vs U.O.I. . — SLP(C) No. 6976/2006

Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010016552006

Filing Date

16-Jan-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 6976/2006

Diary Number

1655/2006

Order Date

13-Sep-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.P. CHANDRAN .

    Adv. PRIYA PURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.O.I. .

    Adv. SHIPRA GHOSE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Jan-2013
  4. 09-Apr-2012
  5. 02-Apr-2012
  6. 26-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 17-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-Dec-2008
  13. 14-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 19-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 14-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 27-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 10-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 21-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 10-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 04-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 12-Dec-2006
  24. 04-Dec-2006
  25. 09-Nov-2006
  26. 21-Sep-2006
  27. 14-Sep-2006
  28. 07-Sep-2006
  29. 04-Aug-2006
  30. 14-Jul-2006
  31. 10-May-2006
  32. 20-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 16-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 6976/2006

  34. 30-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: SLP(C) No. 6976/2006 (K.P. Chandran v. U.O.I.) On 13/09/2013, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 6976/2006 along with related petitions. The Court condoned the delay in filing the substitution application and allowed the substitution application. All SLPs were dismissed as withdrawn to enable parties to approach the High Court by filing writ appeals, with a direction that condonation of delay applications be considered sympathetically under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The Court also requested the High Court to expedite hearing of all pending matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case