LALITA HUNDIYA vs GOVIND KHUTETA . — Crl.A. No. 495/2014
Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010147752008
Filing Date
16-May-2008
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 495/2014
Diary Number
14775/2008
Order Date
24-Feb-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALITA HUNDIYA
Adv. AISHWARYA BHATI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVIND KHUTETA .
Adv. PRAGATI NEEKHRA CHARU MATHUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2008
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 495/2014
Case Summary: Lalita Hundiya v. Govind Khuteta (Crl.A. 495/2014) On 24 February 2014, the Supreme Court allowed Lalita Hundiya's appeal against the High Court of Rajasthan's order (dated 13 February 2008) that had rejected her Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act complaint on the ground that it was signed by her power of attorney holder rather than by her personally. The Court held that complaints signed by a duly authorized attorney holder are maintainable, citing precedent judgments, and set aside the High Court's judgment. The Court directed the Magistrate to proceed with the complaint in accordance with law and expeditiously conclude the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts