THE SECRETARY/CORRESPONDENT. ST. JOHNS COLLEGE AND ANR. ETC. vs DR. S.WILSON AND ORS. ETC. — C.A. No. 10478 - 10498/2011
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010124192010
Filing Date
19-Apr-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 10478 - 10498/2011
Diary Number
12419/2010
Order Date
09-Jan-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Disposed off
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE SECRETARY/CORRESPONDENT. ST. JOHNS COLLEGE AND ANR. ETC.
Adv. R. CHANDRACHUD[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.DR. S.WILSON AND ORS. ETC.
Adv. ROMY CHACKO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1] [Gr] BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1] M. YOGESH KANNA[R-4]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran
-
11-Dec-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar
-
23-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar
-
13-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
25-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar
-
01-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
19-Nov-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-Oct-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
01-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
01-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2015
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
27-Feb-2015
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
28-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 10478 - 10498/2011
CASE SUMMARY: C.A. No. 010478-010498/2011 The Supreme Court upheld the termination of lecturer appointments made by St. John's College officials in August 2008, finding they were illegally appointed by incompetent persons exploiting a now-vacated interim court order. The Court held that granting a hearing was unnecessary given the appointments' fundamental illegality and fraud on the court. The termination orders were upheld solely on grounds of incompetence, and the collusion finding was set aside. The Court allowed the civil appeals and disposed of related petitions, with each party bearing own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts