IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.901 OF 2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 902 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.903 OF 2017 O R D E R 1. Criminal Appeal No.901 of 2017 is filed by the appellant, laying a challenge to the order passed by the High Court declining to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, “Cr.P.C.”) in quashing the proceedings pending against him. Criminal Appeal No.902 of 2017 has been filed by the complainant against the very same impugned judgment and order, quashing the proceedings under Criminal Case No.2870 of 2010 qua accused nos. 2 to 8. Criminal Appeal No.903 of 2017 has been filed against the accused by the same complainant against the order dated 25.09.2013 dismissing Crl. M.P. No.2670 of 2013, filed by him in 2013 for recalling the judgment dated 18.09.2012. 1
2. The accused have been charge-sheeted under Sections 417, 498(A), 306, 406 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”). 3. The appellant is none other than the husband of the deceased, Madhavi. Accused no. 2 and accused no.3 are the father and mother of the appellant respectively. Appellant no.4 is the uncle of the appellant and appellant no.5 is the wife of appellant no.4. Accused nos.6 and 7 are friends who solemnized the marriage between accused no.1 and Madhavi. Accused no.8 is brother of appellant. 4. The marriage between the appellant and Madhavi took place on 08.12.2002. After the marriage, both the appellant and the deceased Madhavi left for the United States of America. Both the appellant and the deceased came back to India from time to time. As the deceased Madhavi was suffering from depression, she used to take treatment occasionally from LW25, Dr. Phani Bhushan, being a specialist in the field of Psychiatry. One day before the incident, i.e. on 11.04.2009, both the accused and the deceased again consulted LW25. The deceased was found to be ill, having lost 20 kgs of weight. On the next day, the deceased died at the residence of the de facto complainant. The cremation took place on 13.04.2009. 2
5. Then, six days after the death of the deceased, the de facto complainant, who is the father of the deceased, and incidentally functioning as a Sub-Inspector of Police, gave a complaint as afore-stated against the appellant and the other accused. 6. The High Court in the impugned order declined to exercise its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the appellant, while quashing the proceedings against the other accused. Aggrieved thus, both the appellant and the de facto complainant are before us. 7. As stated by learned counsel for the appellant, the very factum of death by suicide has not been proved. The statement of LW25, the Psychiatrist who was consulted both by the appellant and the deceased, would show that the deceased was not keeping a good health. Further evidence was also shown to the effect that there is a marital discard, as the appellant was not in speaking terms with the deceased. 8. The de facto complainant being a police officer himself has not given a compliant promptly after the death. On the contrary, he himself performed the cremation the next day, and gave the complaint on 18.04.2009. Statement of LW13 has to be understood on the attending circumstances. The statement given by LW3 also has no value and substance. It is rather strange that the de facto complainant and his 3
family were not aware of any of the facts alleged till such time, especially when the deceased and the accused were visiting them frequently, and the occurrence took place in the de facto complainant’s house. 9. To attract the ingredients of Section 306 IPC, there must be evidence to substantiate the existence of suicide. It should be followed by abetment, as required under Section 107 of the IPC. In as much as we do not find any merit in evidence to support the case of the prosecution that there was a suicide, thereby the statement recorded from LW25 itself shows that the deceased was ailing and therefore, not keeping in good health. 10. Though the trial has begun at least as against the appellant, we are not inclined to dismiss this petition on that ground. Continuation of trial would certainly be prejudicial to the appellant, as we do not find any material evidence sufficient enough to attract the ingredients of Section 306 IPC. The proceedings against the appellant stand quashed. Insofar as the appeals by the de facto complainant against the accused are concerned, the same reasoning along with the reasoning of the High Court would be applicable. 11. In such view of the matter, Criminal Appeal No.901 of 2017 is allowed by setting aside the impugned judgment dated 18.09.2012 passed by the High Court. Consequently, Criminal 4
Appeal No.902 of 2017 and Criminal Appeal No.903 of 2017 stand dismissed. ………………………………………………………J. [M.M. SUNDRESH] ………………………………………………………J. [J.B. PARDIWALA] NEW DELHI 9 th August, 2023 5
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.14 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 901/2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 139731/2022 - STAY APPLICATION) WITH Crl.A. No. 902/2017 (II) Crl.A. No. 903/2017 (II) Date : 09-08-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA For Appellant(s) Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kr. Archiya, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. B Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Mr. Kumar Shashank, Adv. Mr. Bharat J Joshi, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR Mr. B Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Mr. Kumar Shashank, Adv. Mr. Bharat J Joshi, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR 6
Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Kv Girish Chowdary, Adv. Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv. Mr. Meeran Maqbool, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In terms of the signed order, Criminal Appeal No.901 of 2017 is allowed by setting aside the impugned judgment dated 18.09.2012 passed by the High Court. Consequently, Criminal Appeal No.902 of 2017 and Criminal Appeal No.903 of 2017 stand dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (KAVITA PAHUJA) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) [Singed order is placed on the file] 7
ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.14 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 901/2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 139731/2022 - STAY APPLICATION) WITH Crl.A. No. 902/2017 (II) Crl.A. No. 903/2017 (II) Date : 03-08-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA For Appellant(s) Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Kv Girish Chowdary, Adv. Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, list on 09.08.2023. (KAVITA PAHUJA) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.110 COURT NO.7 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).901/2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 139731/2022 - STAY APPLICATION) WITH Crl.A. No. 902/2017 (II) Crl.A. No. 903/2017 (II) Date : 20-07-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH For Appellant(s) Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Mr. Bharat J Joshi, Adv. Ms. Nitipriya Kar, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Mr. Bharat J Joshi, Adv. Ms. Nitipriya Kar, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Kv Girish Chowdary, Adv. Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the appeals on 27.07.2023. (GAGANDEEP SINGH CHADHA) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.4 SECTION II (Mentioning) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 901/2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 902/2017 (II) Crl.A. No. 903/2017 (II) Date : 27-04-2023 These appeals were orally MENTIONED today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA For Parties : Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. (Mentioned by) Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR UPON being MENTIONED the Court made the following O R D E R List on 04.05.2023. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No. 901/2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Respondent(s) ([ Only I.A. Nos. 68269 of 2022 (application for early hearing) in Crl. A. Nos. 902 of 2017 and I.A. NO. 68285 of 2022 (application for early hearing) in Crl. Appeal No.903 of 2017 is listed. ] ) WITH Crl.A. No. 902/2017 (II) (FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 68269/2022 IA No. 68269/2022 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION) Crl.A. No. 903/2017 (II) ( FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 68285/2022 IA No. 68285/2022 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION) Date : 13-07-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Parties Mr. R. Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kr. Archiya, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, AOR Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni,Adv. Mr. Shashank Kumar, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv. Mr. T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv. 1
- 2 - Mr. K.V. Girish Chowdhary, Adv. Mr. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the appeals for hearing before a Bench presided over by Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.R. Shah. IA Nos. 68269/2022 and 68285/2022 are disposed of. (RAJNI MUKHI) (R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) 2
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s).901/2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Respondent(s) (Office Report for direction only in criminal appeal no. 901 of 2017 be listed) Date : 29-07-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI For Appellant(s) Mr.C.S.N.Mohan Rao, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.D.Mahesh Babu, AOR Mr.Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Ms.Tatini Basu, AOR Mr.Amit K. Nain, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On a perusal of the Office Report for Directions dated 26.07.2019, we find that the District Judge, Guntur has sent a letter dated 13.06.2019 to the Registry of this Court requesting for transmission of material papers in SC 75/2013 for the purpose of speedy disposal of SC 75/2013 on the file of Prl.Assistant Judges’Court, Guntur, as the case is pre-2014, if it is not required in Crl.A.Nos.901, 902 and 903 of 2017. The Registry is accordingly directed to send the above- mentioned papers to the concerned trial court immediately. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RAJ RANI NEGI) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Criminal Appeal No(s). 901/2017 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Respondent(s) WITH Crl.A. No. 902/2017 (II) Crl.A. No. 903/2017 (II) Date : 05-07-2018 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, AOR Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, AOR Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to the Ld. Counsel for the parties to file the additional documents. After expiry of four weeks, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar MG
1 ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No. 2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (with appln.for permission to file addl. Documents) SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 01/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For the parties: Mr. M.Surender Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.Santhan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv.
2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. (Shashi Sareen) ( S.S.R.Krishna) AR-cum-PS Assistant Registrar
SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.4576 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 11513 OF 2013 (Application for permission to file additional documents) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.1539 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.10514 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.04.2017 when the court was pleased to pass the following order:. “Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 seeks time to file additional documents indicating that after the proceedings before this Court commenced, the police investigation reveals that the accused is liable to be prosecuted under Section 304-B, IPC. List the matter on 01.05.2017.” It is submitted that pursuant to order quoted above, Counsel for Respondent No.1 has not filed additional documents, till date. Service of show cause notice is complete in all the matters. Counsel for Respondents Nos. 1 to 9 in Special Leave Contd..2/-
-2- Petition(Crl.)No.4576 of 2013, Respondent Nos. 1 to 8 in Special Leave Petition(Crl.)No.1539 of 2013 and Respondent No.1 in Special Leave Petition(Crl.)No.10514 of 2013 has not filed Counter Affidavit. Counter affidavit filed by Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 9 in Special Leave Petition(Crl.)No.10514 of 2013 has been included in Special Leave Petition paper books. The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 27 th day of April, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1.Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Advocate 11, Canning Lane, N.D. 2.Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashoka Road, N.D. 3.Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate 11, Canning Lane, N.D. 4.Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashoka Road, N.D. 5.Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate 38, Tower No.1, Supreme Enclave, Mayur Vihar Phase-I, N.D. C2/SV ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Î1ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012in CRLA No. 2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad)YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report)WITHSLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013(with appln.for permission to file addl. Documents)SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report)Date : 01/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANTFor the parties: Mr. M.Surender Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.Santhan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv.Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv.2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted.(Shashi Sareen) ( S.S.R.Krishna) AR-cum-PS Assistant Registrar
1 ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No. 2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 17/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For the Parties: Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. M.Surender Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Aditya, Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1
2 seeks time to file additional documents indicating that after the proceedings before this Court commenced, the police investigation reveals that the accused is liable to be prosecuted under Section 304-B, IPC. List the matter on 01.05.2017. (Shashi Sareen) (S.S.R.Krishna ) AR-cum-PS Assistant Registrar
Listed on : Court No. : Item : SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.4576 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 11513 OF 2013 (Application for permission to file additional documents) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.1539 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.10514 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 of 2013:- The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10 th May, 2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to all the nine Respondents by registered post A.D. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate has on 24 th July, 2013 filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.1/State but he has not filed Counter Affidavit. Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate has on 4 th September, 2013 filed Cont....2/-
:2: SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 Etc./2013 Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2 but she has not filed the Counter Affidavit. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 but no filed Counter Affidavit. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. The matter above mentioned alongwith other connected matters were listed before the Court of Registrar from time to time and lastly on 28 th October, 2014 when the following order was passed : “The learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 9 do not wish to file counter affidavit. Counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, despite last opportunity given by the Registrar's Court on 25.7.2014. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Court. ” SLP (Crl.)Nos. 1539 & 10514 of 2013 : The matters above mentioned were tagged with SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 of 2013 vide order dated 24 th March, 2014 passed by this Hon'ble Court. Thereafter, the matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court from time to time and then on 12 th December, 2014 when the Court was pleased to inter-alia pass the following order : “... SLP(Crl)No.1539/2013 and SLP(Crl)No.10514/2013 Issue notice. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Cont....3/-
:3: SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 Etc./2013 no.2 in SLP(Crl.) No.10514 of 2013 and seeks time to file the counter affidavit. Let notice be issued to other respondents in both the matters. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted.” SLP (Crl.)No. 1539 of 2013 : Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to all the eight Respondents by registered post A.D. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 7 but he has not filed the Counter Affidavit. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.8/State but he has not filed the Counter Affidavit. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. SLP (Crl.)No. 10514 of 2013 : Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to all the nine Respondents by registered post A.D. as well as dasti. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.1. Counsel has not filed Counter Affidavit, till date. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 to 9. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. Thereafter, the matters i.e. SLP (Crl.)Nos. 1539 & 10514 of 2013 were listed before the Court of Registrar from time to time Cont....4/-
: 4 : and lastly on 29 th October, 2015 when the following order was passed : “Respondents in both the matters herein have failed to file the counter affidavit, despite the time stipulated for the purpose has already expired and the warning of last opportunity was already served upon them. Further opportunity is, therefore, declined. Both the petitions now be processed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.” It is submitted that pursuant to order quoted above, Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 9 in Special Leave Petition(Crl.)No.10514 of 2013 has filed Counter Affidavit in the form of paper books. (Copy of Counter affidavit is circulated herewith for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court). Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in all the above mentioned matters and on all the Respondents. The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 13th day of April, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Advocate 11, Canning Lane New Delhi 2. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashok Road, New Delhi 3. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate 11, Canning Lane 4. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate Andhra Pradesh Bhawan 1, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 5. Ms. Tatin Basu, Advocate 38, Tower No.1, Supreme Enclave Mayur Vihar, Phase I, Delhi c4/dk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ª1ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012in CRLA No. 2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad)YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report)WITHSLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013(With Interim Relief and Office Report)Date : 17/04/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANTFor the Parties: Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. M.Surender Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Aditya, Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 12seeks time to file additional documents indicating that after theproceedings before this Court commenced, the police investigationreveals that the accused is liable to be prosecuted under Section304-B, IPC.List the matter on 01.05.2017.(Shashi Sareen) (S.S.R.Krishna ) AR-cum-PS Assistant Registrar
ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1539/2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 29/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byroponeni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Suchitra Hrangkhowl, Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondents in both the matters herein have failed to file the counter affidavit, despite the time stipulated for the purpose has already expired and the warning of last opportunity was already served upon them. Further opportunity is, therefore, declined. Both the petitions now be processed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
üNo data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.No data found.
ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1539/2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 19/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Ms Lovely Kumari Singh, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit by all the respondents common to both matters herein is still awaited. Be filed within four weeks time as last opportunity. List again on 29.10.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
\214 ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1539/2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 19/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Ms Lovely Kumari Singh, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit by all the respondents common to both matters herein is still awaited. Be filed within four weeks time as last opportunity. List again on 29.10.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.08.2212:27:37 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M.V. RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1539/2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Vijayshree, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(CRL.) NO.1539/2013 The ld. Counsel, Mr Amit K Nain has cured the defects in the vakalatnama. Counter affidavit be filed for respondent nos. 1 to 7 within four weeks time. Respondent no.8 also to file counter affidavit within four weeks time.
-2- Item No.14 SLP(CRL.) NO.10514/2013 Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 9 has reported that no counter affidavit is required to be filed. List again on 19.8.2015. (M.V. RAMESH) Registrar
¦ ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M.V. RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1539/2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 10/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Vijayshree, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(CRL.) NO.1539/2013 The ld. Counsel, Mr Amit K Nain has cured the defects in the vakalatnama. Counter affidavit be filed for respondent nos. 1 to 7 within four weeks time.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.07.1610:54:06 ISTReason: Respondent no.8 also to file counter affidavit within four weeks time. -2-Item No.14SLP(CRL.) NO.10514/2013 Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks time for filingcounter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 9 has reported that
no counter affidavit is required to be filed. List again on 19.8.2015. (M.V. RAMESH) Registrar
ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lovely Singh, Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (Crl.) No. 4576/2013 All the nine respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit despite the warning of last opportunity. However, opportunity is hereby declined. This petition stands complete. However, be listed with the connected petitions. … .2/-
-2- SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 Among eight respondents, vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 has been filed. In respect of Respondent No. 1 it is in order. However, for Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 same is defective but none has entered appearance. SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 Among nine respondents, service on Respondent No. 1 is complete but none has entered appearance. Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 to 9 has been filed but there are defects. Defects be cured. Counter affidavit thereafter, be filed. List on 10.07.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar JG
Listed on : Court No. : Item : SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.4576 OF 2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.1539 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.10514 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Registrar on 13 th February, 2015 when the following order was passed : “ SLP(CRL.) No.4576/2013 Counter affidavit by all the 9 respondents is still awaited. Be filed within four weeks as last opportunity. SLP(CRL.)No.1539/2013 Vakalatnama of respondent Nos. 1 to 7 has been filed, however, the same is found to be defective. The ld. Counsel has mentioned that the only defect pointed out is that signature of respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are on the back page of the vakalatnama. However, registry to verify for the same. With respect to respondent No.8, petitioner is still required to take fresh steps to effect service. Cont....2/-
:2: SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 Etc./2013 SLP (CRL.)No.10514/2013 Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 9 has been filed. However, found defective. The ld. Counsel has mentioned that the only defect pointed out is that signature of respondent Nos. 3 to 9 are on the back page of the vakalatnama. However, registry to verify for the same. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is required to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.1. List again on 1.4.2015.” SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 of 2013 : There are nine Respondents. Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are represented through Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate and Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate respectively. Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 are represented through Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents have not filed the Counter Affidavit, so far. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. SLP (Crl.)No. 1539 of 2013 : It is submitted that Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Same is in order for Respondent No.1 but defective for Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 as Vakalatnama has not been filed in SCR prescribed format in signature of Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are on back page of Vakalatnama/Appearance but Counsel has not cured the above mentioned defect, so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has filed Affidavit of dasti service in respect of Respondent
No.8 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf, so far. SLP (Crl.)No. 10514 of 2013 It is submitted that Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 to 9. Same is in order for Respondent No.2 but defective for Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 as Vakalatnama has not been filed in SCR prescribed format in signature of Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are on back page of Vakalatnama/Appearance but Counsel has not cured the above mentioned defect, so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has filed Affidavit of dasti service in respect of Respondent No.1/State but no one has entered appearance on its behalf, so far. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in respect of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Court of Registrar with this office report. DATED this the 31st day of March, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Advocate 11, Canning Lane New Delhi 2. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashok Road, New Delhi 3. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate 11, Canning Lane c4/dk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
î ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lovely Singh, Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (Crl.) No. 4576/2013 All the nine respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit despite the warning of last opportunity. However, opportunity is hereby declined. This petition stands complete. However, be listed with the connected petitions.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.04.0820:03:29 ISTReason: ....2/- -2- SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 Among eight respondents, vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 has been filed. In respect of Respondent No. 1 it is in order. However, for Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 same is defective but none has entered appearance.
SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 Among nine respondents, service on Respondent No. 1 is complete but none has entered appearance. Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 to 9 has been filed but there are defects. Defects be cured. Counter affidavit thereafter, be filed. List on 10.07.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarJG
ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 13/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Mr R Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr Amit K Nain, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(CRL.) NO.4576/2013 Counter affidavit by all the 9 respondents is still awaited. Be filed within four weeks as last opportunity.
-2- Item No.15 SLP(CRL.) NO.1539/2013 Vakalatnama of respondent Nos. 1 to 7 has been filed, however, the same is found to be defective. The ld. Counsel has mentioned that the only defect pointed out is that signature of respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are on the back page of the vakalatnama. However, registry to verify for the same. With respect to respondent No.8, petitioner is still required to take fresh steps to effect service. SLP(CRL.) NO.10514/2013 Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 9 has been filed. However, found defective. The ld. Counsel has mentioned that the only defect pointed out is that signature of respondent Nos. 3 to 9 are on the back page of the vakalatnama. However, registry to verify for the same. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is required to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.1. List again on 1.4.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
Listed on : Court No. : Item : SECTION-II IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.4576 OF 2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.1539 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS YADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. ... Respondent(s) AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO.10514 OF 2013 KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA ... Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12 th December, 2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ SLP(Crl.) No.4576 of 2013 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has not filed the counter affidavit so far. SLP(Crl)No.1539/2013 and SLP(Crl) No.10514/2013 Issue notice. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.2 in SLP(Crl.) No.10514 of 2013 and seeks time to file the counter affidavit. Let notice be issued to other respondents in both the matters. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted. ” Cont....2/-
:2: SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 Etc./2013 SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 of 2013 : There are nine Respondents. Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are represented through Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate and Ms. Tatini Basu, Advocate respectively. Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 are represented through Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents have not filed the Counter Affidavit, so far. SLP (Crl.)No. 1539 of 2013 : Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to all the eight Respondents by registered post A.D. A.D. card duly signed has been received back from Respondent No.2. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Same is in order for Respondent No.1 but defective for Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 as Vakalatnama has not been filed in SCR prescribed format. Neither A.D. card nor Unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from Respondent No.8/State. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete on Respondent Nos. 1 & 2, but no one has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2. SLP (Crl.)No. 10514 of 2013 Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to all the nine Respondents by registered post A.D. on 23 rd December, 2014. Cont....3/-
:3: SLP (Crl.)No. 4576 Etc./2013 Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 to 9. Same is in order for Respondent No.2 but Counsel has not filed the Counter Affidavit, so far, but defective for Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 as Vakalatnama has not been filed in SCR prescribed format. Neither A.D. card nor Unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from Respondent No.1/State. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete in respect of Respondent No.2. The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Court of Registrar with this office report. DATED this the 11th day of February, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Advocate 11, Canning Lane New Delhi 2. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate A.P. Bhawan, 1, Ashok Road, New Delhi 3. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Advocate 11, Canning Lane c4/dk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ê ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 13/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Mr R Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr Amit K Nain, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(CRL.) NO.4576/2013Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2015.02.1714:00:40 ISTReason: Counter affidavit by all the 9 respondents is still awaited. Be filed within four weeks as last opportunity. -2-Item No.15SLP(CRL.) NO.1539/2013 Vakalatnama of respondent Nos. 1 to 7 has been filed,however, the same is found to be defective. The ld.Counsel has mentioned that the only defect pointed out is
that signature of respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are on the backpage of the vakalatnama. However, registry to verify forthe same. With respect to respondent No.8, petitioner is stillrequired to take fresh steps to effect service.SLP(CRL.) NO.10514/2013 Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 9 hasbeen filed. However, found defective. The ld. Counsel hasmentioned that the only defect pointed out is thatsignature of respondent Nos. 3 to 9 are on the back pageof the vakalatnama. However, registry to verify for thesame. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is required totake fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.1. List again on 1.4.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.4576/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No.2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No.1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and ) SLP(Crl) No.10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 12/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Surender Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kr. Pandey, Adv. Mr. Aditya K., Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Kanda Venkata Narayana, Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. For Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv.
2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(Crl.) No.4576 of 2013 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has not filed the counter affidavit so far. SLP(Crl) No.1539/2013 and SLP(Crl) No.10514/2013 Issue notice. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.2 in SLP(Crl.) No.10514 of 2013 and seeks time to file the counter affidavit. Let notice be issued to other respondents in both the matters. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.4576/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No.2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No.1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and ) SLP(Crl) No.10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 12/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Surender Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kr. Pandey, Adv. Mr. Aditya K., Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Kanda Venkata Narayana, Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s)Signature Not Verified Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv.Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2014.12.12 Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. For Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv.14:53:50 ISTReason: Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E RSLP(Crl.) No.4576 of 2013 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has not filedthe counter affidavit so far.SLP(Crl) No.1539/2013 and SLP(Crl) No.10514/2013 Issue notice. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, learned counsel, appears and acceptsnotice on behalf of respondent no.2 in SLP(Crl.) No.10514 of 2013and seeks time to file the counter affidavit. Let notice be issued to other respondents in both the matters. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No. 2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.) SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 28/11/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. M.Surender Rao,Sr.Adv. Mr. R. Santhanan Krishnan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Kr. Pandey,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. G.Prabhakar,Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Adjourned for two weeks. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No. 2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.) SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 21/11/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. M.Surender Rao,Sr.Adv. Mr. R.Santhnan Krishnan,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. G.Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Bharat J.Joshi,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) Ms. Prerna Singh,Adv. Mr. G.Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv.(NP)
-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents, hearing of these matters is adjourned for one week. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (INDU POKHRIYAL) COURT MASTER
\220 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No. 2870/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T.) SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 21/11/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. M.Surender Rao,Sr.Adv. Mr. R.Santhnan Krishnan,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. G.Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Bharat J.Joshi,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) Ms. Prerna Singh,Adv. Mr. G.Prabhakar,Adv.Signature Not Verified Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv.Digitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2014.11.2116:51:48 ISTReason: Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv.(NP) -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counselfor the respondents, hearing of these matters is adjourned
for one week. (SUMAN WADHWA) (INDU POKHRIYAL) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and ) SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 28/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. Aditya Kumar Archiya, Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prashant Mathur, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 9 do not wish to file counter affidavit. Counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, despite last opportunity given by the Registrar's Court on 25.7.2014. Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Court. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
H ITEM NO.29 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and ) SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 28/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. Mr. Aditya Kumar Archiya, Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Prashant Mathur, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 9 do not wish to file counter affidavit. Counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, despite last opportunity given by theSignature Not Verified Registrar's Court on 25.7.2014.Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.10.3017:45:41 ISTReason: Let the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Court. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
T ITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4576/2013 YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1539/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing o.t. and ) SLP(Crl) No. 10514/2013 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing o.t. and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 25/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Santhan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao ,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan B., Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu ,Adv. Mr. Suyodhan B., Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu ,Adv. Mr. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(Crl.) No.4576/2013 Four weeks' time is granted, as last opportunity, to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.07.2612:29:37 ISTReason: Service is complete on respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 to 7 and 9 but no one has put in appearance.Item No.38 -2- Petitioner to file spare copies of SLP for effectingservice on respondent Nos.4 and 8.
List again on 28.10.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
JITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4576/2013YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents andoffice report)WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 10514 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 1539 of 2013(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 16/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(Crl.) No.4576/2013 Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted six weeks' timeto file counter affidavit. Complete set of the pleadings hasbeen received by the learned counsel appearing on theirbehalf. Respondent Nos.3, 5 to 7 and 9 are reported to beduly and properly served through post but none appeared ontheir behalf.Item No.46 -2- Notice be reissued to respondent Nos.4 and 8 throughthe concerned District Court besides usual mode.SLP(Crl) NO. 10514 and 1539 of 2013 Being fresh matter has been ordered to be taggedalongwith the SLP(Crl.) No.4576/2013. List again on 25.7.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRAR
rd
"ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.14 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1539/2013(From the judgement and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No.2870/2010, ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSYADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.)WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 10514 of 2013(With appln(s) for exemption from filing OT and prayer for interim reliefand office report)Date: 24/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv. Mr. Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Rai, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post for hearing with S.L.P.(Criminal) No. 4576 of 2013. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar || | | |
\236ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.6 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1539/2013(From the judgement and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No.2870/2010, ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSYADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.)Date: 26/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHARFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Tatini Basu,AOR. Mr. B.Suyodhan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter after four weeks, as prayed for.|(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Sharda Kapoor) ||AR-cum-PS | |Court Master |
¤ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2013 CRLMP.NO(s). 10413(From the judgement and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No.2870/2010, ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF A.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport)Date: 10/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Giri, Sr.Adv. Mr. R. Santhan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master
2ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1539/2013(From the judgement and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No.2870/2010 of TheHIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSYADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.)Date: 01/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Suyodhan,Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, six weeks' time is granted for filing additional documents on record. List thereafter. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master
rITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).1539/2013(From the judgement and order dated 18/09/2012 in CRLA No.2870/2010, ofThe HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)KANDA VENKATA NARAYANA Petitioner(s) VERSUSYADDANAPUDI PARAMESWARA RAO & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T.)Date: 04/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Suyodhan, Adv. Mr. K. Venkata Narayana, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. Three weeks' time is allowed to the petitioner for filing additional documents. List thereafter. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master