IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.NO.47 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.898-908 of 2015 Arjun & Ors. Etc.Etc. … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS H.S.I.D.C Ltd. (Now known as Haryana.. RESPONDENT(S) State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation) & Ors.Etc.Etc. O R D E R 1. Prayer made in Interlocutory Application No.47 of 2011 for discharge from Guardianship is allowed. … .................CJI (H.L. DATTU) … ..................J. (ARUN MISHRA) … ..................J. (AMITAVA ROY) NEW DELHI, JULY 10, 2015.
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.1 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 47/2011 in Civil Appeal No(s). 898-908/2015 ARJUN & ORS.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS HARYANA STATE INDUST.DEVL.CORP.LTD.ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. for discharge from guardianship and with office report) Date : 10/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Appellant(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Saurabh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.B.K.Satija, AAG Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.47 is allowed, in terms of the signed order. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) AR-cum-PS Asstt.Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file)
SECTION IV B Listed on 10.07.2015 Court No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 47 (Application for Discharge from Guardianship) IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 898908 OF 2015 @ SLP(C)No. 11411 11421 OF 2011. Arjun & Ors. Etc. Etc. Petitioner(s) Versus Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.(Now known as Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation) & Ors. Etc. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith other connected matter on 20.01.2015, when the Court was inter alia pleased to pass the following order: “ ….... Delay, in filing the application(s) for substitution, if any, is condoned. Application(s) for substitution, if any, is/are allowed. Delay, in filing special leave petition(s)if any, is /are condoned. Leave granted. All the civil appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order. ” It is submitted that the Counsel for the petitioners has at the time of filing the SLP, filed an application for discharging of Guardianship of the petitioner no. 7 namely Sita @ Sita Ram and petitioner no. 8 namely Charani @ Charan Singha respectively in RFA No. 2970 of 2008 in the matter abovementioned and the same is pending.
It is further submitted that the Paper Books of instant Civil Appeals have been weeded out after expiry period of due preservation. The application in the matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 6th day of July, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip
h IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.NO.47 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.898-908 of 2015 Arjun & Ors. Etc.Etc. ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS H.S.I.D.C Ltd. (Now known as Haryana.. RESPONDENT(S) State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation) & Ors.Etc.Etc. O R D E R 1. Prayer made in Interlocutory Application No.47 of 2011 for discharge from Guardianship is allowed. ....................CJI (H.L. DATTU) .....................J. (ARUN MISHRA) .....................J. (AMITAVA ROY) NEW DELHI, JULY 10, 2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRamana Venkata GantiDate: 2015.07.1417:52:55 ISTReason:ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.1 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 47/2011 in Civil Appeal No(s). 898-908/2015ARJUN & ORS.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSHARYANA STATE INDUST.DEVL.CORP.LTD.ETC. Respondent(s)(with appln. for discharge from guardianship and with officereport)Date : 10/07/2015 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Appellant(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Saurabh Gupta, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.B.K.Satija, AAG Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.No.47 is allowed, in terms of the signed order. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) AR-cum-PS Asstt.Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file)
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 727-800 OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos.10285-10358 of 2011) Omkar Singh & Ors. ...Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 801-811 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10362-10372 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 812-821 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10374-10383 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 822-886 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.10406-10470 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 887-897 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10480-10490 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 898-908 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 11411-11421 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 909-989 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 11422-11502 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 990-1000 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 12044-12054 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1001-1005 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14449-14453 of 2011)
2 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1006-1044 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 15314-15352 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1045 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 15353 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1046-1053 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 19439-19446 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1054-1069 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 19447-19462 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1070 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 25485 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1071-1073 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 8108-8110 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1074-1076 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 22134-22136 of 2013) O R D E R 1. Delay, in filing the application(s) for substitution, if any, is condoned. 2. Application(s) for substitution, if any, is/are allowed. 3. Delay, in filing special leave petition(s) if any, is/are condoned.
3 4. Leave granted. 5. Since the facts involved in all these appeals are identical, for the sake of convenience, this Court would notice the facts only in the Civil Appeal(s) arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10285-10358 of 2011. Civil Appeal Nos. 727-800 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10285-10358 of 2011) 6. The claimants, aggrieved by the judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, passed in a batch of Regular First Appeals, dated 23.08.2010, are before us in these appeals. In the said batch of regular first appeals, the High Court has disposed of the matters by relying upon the reasons in its main judgment and final order in R.F.A. No. 3323 of 2005, dated 23.08.2010. 7. The facts in brief are: The lis pertains to the acquisition of 8,789 Kanals and 11 marlas of land in nine villages being village Chirhara,
4 Jaliawas, Suthani, Rudh, Asalwas, Pathuhera, Suthana, Banipur and Jalalpur, all situated in District Rewari, Haryana. The State of Haryana issued notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, “the Act”), to acquire the said land for the public purpose of development as an Industrial Growth Centre at Bawal, dated 10/12.9.1992. This was followed by notification, issued under Section 6 of the Act, dated 03.09.1993. Acquisition regarding village Chirahara 8. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, “the Collector”) vide two separate awards, assessed compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,10,000/- per acre for Chari and Gair Mumkin kind of land; Rs. 85,000/- per acre for Barani land; Rs. 1,25,000/- per acre for land near road on National Highway No. 71 (Rewari-Bawal road) and Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre upto depth of two acres on national Highway No. 8, dated 12.08.1995 and
5 25.08.1995. 9. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections and sought for a reference under Section 18 of the Act. The learned Reference Court assessed the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs.4,80,000/- per acre for the land falling upto the depth of 500 meters on National Highway No. 8 and 71 and Rs. 3,20,000/- per acre for the land beyond 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 as well as State Highway (Rewari-Bawal road) for all types of land. Acquisition regarding village Jaliawas 10. The collector assessed compensation at the rate of Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi Kind of land; Rs. 60,000/- per acre for Barani land; Rs. 40,000/- per acre for Banjar kind of land; Rs. 1,10,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land; Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for land on National Highway
6 No. 8 and Rs. 1,50,000/- per acre on Rewari-Bawal Road, vide award dated 16.06.1994. 11. Dissatisfied with the award of the collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned Reference Court assessed the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 3,30,000/- per acre for the land falling upto the depth of 500 meters on National Highway No. 8 and 71 and Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for the land beyond 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 as well as State Highway (Rewari-Bawal road) for all types of land. Acquisition regarding village Suthani 12. The Collector assessed compensation at the rate of Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi kind of land; Rs. 60,000/- per acre for Barani land; Rs. 40,000/- per acre for Banjar kind of land and Rs. 1,10,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land, vide
7 award dated 09.06.1994. 13. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned Reference Court assessed the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for all types of land. Acquisition regarding village Rudh 14. The Collector assessed compensation at the rate of Rs. 90,000/- per acre for Chahi Land; Rs. 1,40,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land and Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for the land falling upto two acres on national Highway No. 8, vide his award dated 25.08.1995. 15. Dissatisfied with the award of the collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned Reference Court assessed the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 4,00,000/- per
8 acre upto 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 and Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre for the remaining land. Acquisition regarding villages Aswalwas, Pathuhera and Suthana 16. The Collector, vide different awards, assessed the market value of the acquired land for Asalwas village as Rs. 90,000/- per acre for Chahi land; Rs. 85,000/- per acre for Barani land, Rs.55,000/- per acre for Bhood land, Rs. 1,35,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land, Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for land on National Highway No. 8 upto two acres. For the land acquired in village Pathuhera, Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi land Rs. 70,000/- per acre for Barani land, Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for land on National Highway No. 8 upto two acres was awarded. For the land acquired in village Suthana, Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi land; Rs. 60,000/- per acre for Barani land, Rs. 40,000/- per acre for Banjar land and Rs. 1,10,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land,
9 Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for land on National Highway No. 8 upto two acres and Rs. 1,25,000/- per acre for the land on Rewari-Bawal road was awarded. 17. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned Reference Court assessed the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre for the land upto the depth of 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No.8 and State Highway No. 71 and Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for the remaining land. Acquisition regarding village Banipur 18. The Collector, vide award dated 05.06.1994, assessed compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,00,000/- per acre for Chahi land; Rs. 85,000/- for Bhood land and Rs. 90,000/- per acre for Barani land.
10 19. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned Reference Court assessed the market value of the said acquired land at the rate of Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre for land for all kinds of land. Acquisition regarding village Jalapur 20. The Collector, vide his award dated 25.08.1995, assessed compensation at the rate of Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi land and Rs. 1,10,000/- per acre for the land falling on both sides of road two acres. 21. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned Reference Court assessed the market value of the said acquired land at the rate of Rs. 2,20,000/- per acre for land upto the depth of 500 meters on both sides of the road Rs. 1,60,000/- per acre for
11 remaining land. 22. The land owners as well as the Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (for short, “the H.S.I.D.C.”) preferred appeals against the aforesaid awards of the learned Reference Court. The High Court vide detailed judgment in R.F.A. No. 703 of 2003, titled Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation vs Mehar Chand and others , dated 06.09.2006, remanded the appeals with a direction to the learned Reference Court for fresh determination of market value of the acquired land on the basis of evidence already led by the parties. 23. On remand, the learned Reference Court, vide different awards, assessed the market value of the acquired land for different rates, the details of which are as under:
12 Name of village Amount awarded per acre Chirhara Rs. 5,20,000/- per acre upto 500 meters on National Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road. Rs.3,20,000/- per acre beyond 500 meters. Jaliawas Rs. 3,30,000/- per acre upto 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road. Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre beyond 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road. Suthani Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre. Rudh Rs. 4,00,000/- per acre upto 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8. Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre for the remaining land. Asalwas, Patuhera and Suthana Rs. 3,30,000/- per acre upto 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road.
13 Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for the land beyond 500 meters on both sides of National Highway no. 8 and Rewari-Bawal Road. Banipur Rs. 3,00,000/- for all types of land. Jalapur Rs. 2,00,000/- for land upto depth of two acres on both sides of road. Rs. 1,60,000/- per acre for remaining land. 24. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order(s) so passed, the H.S.I.D.C. as well as claimants approached the High Court by way of Regular First Appeals. To determine the fair market value, the High Court took into consideration the average price of certain sale instances relating to village Chirhara, which was regarded as the best evidence and arrived at an amount of Rs. 5,84,000/- per acre, after granting 12% increase per annum from the date of sale deed to the date
14 of notification under Section 4 of the Act. The High Court further held that a development cut of 1/3rd is to be applied to aforesaid price which brought the said amount to Rs. 3,91,280/- per acre, which was finally rounded off to Rs. 4,00,000/- per acre. 25. The High Court, vide the impugned judgment and order, awarded a common compensation in all the villages, dated 23.08.2010. The same is as follows: Rs. 4,00,000/- per acre for the land situated upto 500 meters on NH-8; and Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre for the lands situated on either side of Rewari-Bawal road upto 500 meters depth and for land beyond 500 meters on NH-8, but within 500 meters of Rewari-Bewal Road. For the remaining land, the High Court has awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre. 26. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order passed by the High court, the claimants are
15 before us in these appeals. 27. We have heard learned counsels for the parties to the lis and have also carefully perused the award(s)/order(s) passed by the Courts below. 28. In our considered opinion, keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and also other factors, we deem it appropriate to enhance the compensation awarded by the High Court. Therefore the compensation is increased from Rs. 4,00,000/- acre to Rs. 5,00,000/- for the land situated upto 500 meters on NH-8 in all the villages; from Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre to Rs. 4,00,000/- for the lands situated on either side of Rewari-Bawal road upto 500 meters depth and for land beyond 500 meters on NH-8 but within 500 meters of Rewari-Bewal Road; and for the remaining land, we enhance the compensation from Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre to Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre. This Court further grants an interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the High Court
16 order, with all statutory benefits on the enhanced amount. 29. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court stands modified to the aforesaid extent. 30. In the result, all the civil appeals are allowed in terms of the order passed above. Ordered accordingly. ...................CJI . [ H.L. DATTU ] .....................J. [ A.K. SIKRI ] .....................J. [ ARUN MISHRA ] NEW DELHI, JANUARY 20, 2015.
17
1 ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.10285-10358/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No. 233/2009, RFA No. 5072/2008, RFA No. 5087/2008, RFA No. 150/2009, RFA No. 585/2009, RFA No. 584/2009, RFA No. 5583/2008, RFA No. 5089/2008, RFA No. 3105/2009, RFA No. 444/2009, RFA No. 292/2009, RFA No. 620/2009, RFA No. 230/2009, RFA No. 301/2009, RFA No. 298/2009, RFA No. 235/2009, RFA No. 232/2009, RFA No. 286/2009, RFA No. 284/2009, RFA No. 299/2009, RFA No. 5733/2008, RFA No. 5629/2008, RFA No. 5739/2008, RFA No. 5735/2008,RFA No. 5737/2008, RFA No. 5736/2008, RFA No. 229/2009, RFA No. 225/2009, RFA No. 289/2009, RFA No. 5628/2008, RFA No. 5627/2008, RFA No. 236/2009, RFA No. 5082/2008, RFA No. 5090/2008, RFA No. 5080/2008, RFA No. 5738/2008, RFA No. 5732/2008, RFA No. 5083/2008, RFA No. 5084/2008, RFA No. 1379/2009, RFA No. 300/2009, RFA No. 222/2009, RFA No. 5079/2008, RFA No. 5075/2008, RFA No. 5042/2008, RFA No. 5731/2008, RFA No. 5734/2008, RFA No. 5074/2008, RFA No. 287/2009, RFA No. 5078/2008,RFA No. 5085/2008, RFA No. 5306/2008, RFA No. 279/2009, RFA No. 5094/2008, RFA No. 5095/2008, RFA No. 5308/2008, RFA No. 443/2009, RFA No. 227/2009, RFA No. 5305/2008, RFA No. 220/2009, RFA No. 237/2009,RFA No. 226/2009, RFA No. 223/2009, RFA No. 293/2009, RFA No. 5091/2008, RFA No. 5182/2008, RFA No. 5077/2008, RFA No. 5093/2008, RFA No. 5092/2008, RFA No. 5081/2008, RFA No. 307/2009, RFA No. 5086/2008, RFA No. 5781/2008, RFA No. 5780/2008, passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 10362-10372/2011
2 SLP(C) No. 10374-10383/2011 SLP(C) No. 10406-10470/2011 SLP(C) No. 10480-10490/2011 SLP(C) No. 11411-11421/2011 SLP(C) No. 11422-11502/2011 SLP(C) No. 12044-12054/2011 SLP(C) No. 14449-14453/2011 SLP(C) No. 15314-15352/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from complying with S.C. rules and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 15353/2011 SLP(C) No. 17886-17890/2011 SLP(C) No. 19439-19446/2011 SLP(C) No. 19447-19462/2011 SLP(C) No. 25485/2011 SLP(C) No. 8108-8110/2013 SLP(C) No. 22134-2236/2013 (With applns. for c/delay in filing substitution applications, substitution applications, c/delay in filing SLPs., if any in respective matters) Date : 20/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
3 For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. M.S. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. N.P. Midha, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. H.P.S. Gumal, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Grover, AAG Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos. 17886-17890 of 2011 Delinked. In Rest of the matters Delay, in filing the application(s) for substitution, if any, is condoned. Application(s) for substitution, if any, is/are allowed. Delay, in filing special leave petition(s) if any, is /are condoned.
4 Leave granted. All the civil appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]
« 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 727-800 OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos.10285-10358 of 2011) Omkar Singh & Ors. ...Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors Etc. Etc. ...Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 801-811 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10362-10372 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 812-821 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10374-10383 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 822-886 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.10406-10470 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 887-897 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10480-10490 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 898-908 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 11411-11421 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 909-989 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 11422-11502 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 990-1000 OF 2015Signature Not Verified (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 12044-12054 of 2011)Digitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2015.01.2913:13:23 ISTReason: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1001-1005 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14449-14453 of 2011) 2 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1006-1044 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 15314-15352 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1045 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 15353 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1046-1053 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 19439-19446 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1054-1069 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 19447-19462 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1070 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 25485 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1071-1073 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 8108-8110 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1074-1076 OF 2015
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 22134-22136 of 2013) O R D E R1. Delay, in filing the application(s) forsubstitution, if any, is condoned.2. Application(s) for substitution, if any,is/are allowed.3. Delay, in filing special leave petition(s)if any, is/are condoned. 34. Leave granted.5. Since the facts involved in all theseappeals are identical, for the sake ofconvenience, this Court would notice the factsonly in the Civil Appeal(s) arising out of SLP(C)Nos. 10285-10358 of 2011.Civil Appeal Nos. 727-800 of 2015(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 10285-10358 of 2011)6. The claimants, aggrieved by the judgment(s)and order(s) passed by the High Court of Punjab &Haryana at Chandigarh, passed in a batch ofRegular First Appeals, dated 23.08.2010, arebefore us in these appeals. In the said batch ofregular first appeals, the High Court has disposedof the matters by relying upon the reasons in itsmain judgment and final order in R.F.A. No. 3323of 2005, dated 23.08.2010.7. The facts in brief are: The lis pertains tothe acquisition of 8,789 Kanals and 11 marlas ofland in nine villages being village Chirhara, 4Jaliawas, Suthani, Rudh, Asalwas, Pathuhera,Suthana, Banipur and Jalalpur, all situated inDistrict Rewari, Haryana. The State of Haryanaissued notification under Section 4 of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, "the Act"), toacquire the said land for the public purpose ofdevelopment as an Industrial Growth Centre atBawal, dated 10/12.9.1992. This was followed bynotification, issued under Section 6 of the Act,dated 03.09.1993.Acquisition regarding village Chirahara8. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short,"the Collector") vide two separate awards,assessed compensation at the rate of Rs.1,10,000/- per acre for Chari and Gair Mumkin kindof land; Rs. 85,000/- per acre for Barani land;Rs. 1,25,000/- per acre for land near road onNational Highway No. 71 (Rewari-Bawal road) andRs. 2,00,000/- per acre upto depth of two acres onnational Highway No. 8, dated 12.08.1995 and 525.08.1995.9. Dissatisfied with the award of theCollector, the land owners filed objections andsought for a reference under Section 18 of theAct. The learned Reference Court assessed themarket value of the acquired land at the rate ofRs.4,80,000/- per acre for the land falling uptothe depth of 500 meters on National Highway No. 8and 71 and Rs. 3,20,000/- per acre for the landbeyond 500 meters on both sides of NationalHighway No. 8 as well as State Highway(Rewari-Bawal road) for all types of land.Acquisition regarding village Jaliawas10. The collector assessed compensation at therate of Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi Kind ofland; Rs. 60,000/- per acre for Barani land; Rs.
40,000/- per acre for Banjar kind of land; Rs.1,10,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land; Rs.2,00,000/- per acre for land on National Highway 6No. 8 and Rs. 1,50,000/- per acre on Rewari-BawalRoad, vide award dated 16.06.1994.11. Dissatisfied with the award of thecollector, the land owners filed objections. Onreference under Section 18 of the Act, the learnedReference Court assessed the market value of theacquired land at the rate of Rs. 3,30,000/- peracre for the land falling upto the depth of 500meters on National Highway No. 8 and 71 and Rs.2,00,000/- per acre for the land beyond 500 meterson both sides of National Highway No. 8 as well asState Highway (Rewari-Bawal road) for all types ofland.Acquisition regarding village Suthani12. The Collector assessed compensation at therate of Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi kind ofland; Rs. 60,000/- per acre for Barani land;Rs. 40,000/- per acre for Banjar kind of land andRs. 1,10,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land, vide 7award dated 09.06.1994.13. Dissatisfied with the award of theCollector, the land owners filed objections. Onreference under Section 18 of the Act, the learnedReference Court assessed the market value of theacquired land at the rate of Rs. 2,00,000/- peracre for all types of land.Acquisition regarding village Rudh14. The Collector assessed compensation at therate of Rs. 90,000/- per acre for Chahi Land; Rs.
1,40,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land and Rs.2,00,000/- per acre for the land falling upto twoacres on national Highway No. 8, vide his awarddated 25.08.1995.15. Dissatisfied with the award of thecollector, the land owners filed objections. Onreference under Section 18 of the Act, the learnedReference Court assessed the market value of theacquired land at the rate of Rs. 4,00,000/- per 8acre upto 500 meters on both sides of NationalHighway No. 8 and Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre for theremaining land.Acquisition regarding villages Aswalwas, Pathuheraand Suthana16. The Collector, vide different awards,assessed the market value of the acquired land forAsalwas village as Rs. 90,000/- per acre for Chahiland; Rs. 85,000/- per acre for Barani land,Rs.55,000/- per acre for Bhood land, Rs.1,35,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land, Rs.2,00,000/- per acre for land on National HighwayNo. 8 upto two acres. For the land acquired invillage Pathuhera, Rs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahiland Rs. 70,000/- per acre for Barani land,Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for land on NationalHighway No. 8 upto two acres was awarded. For theland acquired in village Suthana, Rs. 80,000/- peracre for Chahi land; Rs. 60,000/- per acre forBarani land, Rs. 40,000/- per acre for Banjar landand Rs. 1,10,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin land, 9Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for land on NationalHighway No. 8 upto two acres and Rs. 1,25,000/-per acre for the land on Rewari-Bawal road was
awarded.17. Dissatisfied with the award of theCollector, the land owners filed objections. Onreference under Section 18 of the Act, the learnedReference Court assessed the market value of theacquired land at the rate of Rs. 3,00,000/- peracre for the land upto the depth of 500 meters onboth sides of National Highway No.8 and StateHighway No. 71 and Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for theremaining land.Acquisition regarding village Banipur18. The Collector, vide award dated 05.06.1994,assessed compensation at the rate of Rs.1,00,000/- per acre for Chahi land; Rs. 85,000/-for Bhood land and Rs. 90,000/- per acre forBarani land. 1019. Dissatisfied with the award of theCollector, the land owners filed objections. Onreference under Section 18 of the Act, the learnedReference Court assessed the market value of thesaid acquired land at the rate of Rs. 3,00,000/-per acre for land for all kinds of land.Acquisition regarding village Jalapur20. The Collector, vide his award dated25.08.1995, assessed compensation at the rate ofRs. 80,000/- per acre for Chahi land and Rs.1,10,000/- per acre for the land falling on bothsides of road two acres.21. Dissatisfied with the award of theCollector, the land owners filed objections. Onreference under Section 18 of the Act, the learnedReference Court assessed the market value of the
said acquired land at the rate of Rs. 2,20,000/-per acre for land upto the depth of 500 meters onboth sides of the road Rs. 1,60,000/- per acre for 11remaining land.22. The land owners as well as the Haryana StateIndustrial Development Corporation (for short,"the H.S.I.D.C.") preferred appeals against theaforesaid awards of the learned Reference Court.The High Court vide detailed judgment in R.F.A.No. 703 of 2003, titled Haryana State IndustrialDevelopment Corporation vs Mehar Chand and others,dated 06.09.2006, remanded the appeals with adirection to the learned Reference Court for freshdetermination of market value of the acquired landon the basis of evidence already led by theparties.23. On remand, the learned Reference Court, videdifferent awards, assessed the market value of theacquired land for different rates, the details ofwhich are as under: 12 Name of Amount awarded per acre villageChirhara Rs. 5,20,000/- per acre upto 500 meters on National Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road. Rs.3,20,000/- per acre beyond 500 meters.Jaliawas Rs. 3,30,000/- per acre upto 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road. Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre beyond 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road.Suthani Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre.Rudh Rs. 4,00,000/- per acre upto 500 meters on both sides of National Highway No. 8.
Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre for the remaining land.Asalwas, Rs. 3,30,000/- per acre upto 500Patuhera and meters on both sides of NationalSuthana Highway No. 8 and Rewari-Bawal road. 13 Rs. 2,00,000/- per acre for the land beyond 500 meters on both sides of National Highway no. 8 and Rewari-Bawal Road.Banipur Rs. 3,00,000/- for all types of land.Jalapur Rs. 2,00,000/- for land upto depth of two acres on both sides of road. Rs. 1,60,000/- per acre for remaining land.24. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order(s) sopassed, the H.S.I.D.C. as well as claimantsapproached the High Court by way of Regular FirstAppeals. To determine the fair market value, theHigh Court took into consideration the averageprice of certain sale instances relating tovillage Chirhara, which was regarded as the bestevidence and arrived at an amount of Rs.5,84,000/- per acre, after granting 12% increaseper annum from the date of sale deed to the date 14of notification under Section 4 of the Act. TheHigh Court further held that a development cut of1/3rd is to be applied to aforesaid price whichbrought the said amount to Rs. 3,91,280/- peracre, which was finally rounded off to Rs.4,00,000/- per acre.25. The High Court, vide the impugned judgmentand order, awarded a common compensation in allthe villages, dated 23.08.2010. The same is asfollows: Rs. 4,00,000/- per acre for the landsituated upto 500 meters on NH-8; and Rs.
3,00,000/- per acre for the lands situated oneither side of Rewari-Bawal road upto 500 metersdepth and for land beyond 500 meters on NH-8, butwithin 500 meters of Rewari-Bewal Road. For theremaining land, the High Court has awardedcompensation at the rate of Rs. 2,00,000/- peracre.26. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment andorder passed by the High court, the claimants are 15before us in these appeals.27. We have heard learned counsels for theparties to the lis and have also carefully perusedthe award(s)/order(s) passed by the Courts below.28. In our considered opinion, keeping in viewthe peculiar facts and circumstances of the caseand also other factors, we deem it appropriate toenhance the compensation awarded by the HighCourt. Therefore the compensation is increasedfrom Rs. 4,00,000/- acre to Rs. 5,00,000/- for theland situated upto 500 meters on NH-8 in all thevillages; from Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre to Rs.4,00,000/- for the lands situated on either sideof Rewari-Bawal road upto 500 meters depth and forland beyond 500 meters on NH-8 but within 500meters of Rewari-Bewal Road; and for the remainingland, we enhance the compensation from Rs.2,00,000/- per acre to Rs. 3,00,000/- per acre.This Court further grants an interest at the rateof 6% per annum from the date of the High Court 16order, with all statutory benefits on the enhancedamount.29. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passedby the High Court stands modified to the aforesaid
extent.30. In the result, all the civil appeals areallowed in terms of the order passed above. Ordered accordingly. ...................CJI. [ H.L. DATTU ] .....................J. [ A.K. SIKRI ] .....................J. [ ARUN MISHRA ]NEW DELHI,JANUARY 20, 2015.17 1ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.10285-10358/2011(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated23/08/2010 in RFA No. 233/2009, RFA No. 5072/2008, RFA No.5087/2008, RFA No. 150/2009, RFA No. 585/2009, RFA No.584/2009, RFA No. 5583/2008, RFA No. 5089/2008, RFA No.3105/2009, RFA No. 444/2009, RFA No. 292/2009, RFA No.620/2009, RFA No. 230/2009, RFA No. 301/2009, RFA No.298/2009, RFA No. 235/2009, RFA No. 232/2009, RFA No.286/2009, RFA No. 284/2009, RFA No. 299/2009, RFA No.5733/2008, RFA No. 5629/2008, RFA No. 5739/2008, RFA No.5735/2008,RFA No. 5737/2008, RFA No. 5736/2008, RFA No.229/2009, RFA No. 225/2009, RFA No. 289/2009, RFA No.5628/2008, RFA No. 5627/2008, RFA No. 236/2009, RFA No.5082/2008, RFA No. 5090/2008, RFA No. 5080/2008, RFA No.5738/2008, RFA No. 5732/2008, RFA No. 5083/2008, RFA No.5084/2008, RFA No. 1379/2009, RFA No. 300/2009, RFA No.222/2009, RFA No. 5079/2008, RFA No. 5075/2008, RFA No.5042/2008, RFA No. 5731/2008, RFA No. 5734/2008, RFA No.5074/2008, RFA No. 287/2009, RFA No. 5078/2008,RFA No.5085/2008, RFA No. 5306/2008, RFA No. 279/2009, RFA No.5094/2008, RFA No. 5095/2008, RFA No. 5308/2008, RFA No.443/2009, RFA No. 227/2009, RFA No. 5305/2008, RFA No.220/2009, RFA No. 237/2009,RFA No. 226/2009, RFA No. 223/2009,RFA No. 293/2009, RFA No. 5091/2008, RFA No. 5182/2008, RFANo. 5077/2008, RFA No. 5093/2008, RFA No. 5092/2008, RFA No.5081/2008, RFA No. 307/2009, RFA No. 5086/2008, RFA No.5781/2008, RFA No. 5780/2008, passed by the High Court OfPunjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)WITHSLP(C) No. 10362-10372/2011 2 SLP(C) No. 10374-10383/2011 SLP(C) No. 10406-10470/2011 SLP(C) No. 10480-10490/2011 SLP(C) No. 11411-11421/2011 SLP(C) No. 11422-11502/2011 SLP(C) No. 12044-12054/2011 SLP(C) No. 14449-14453/2011 SLP(C) No. 15314-15352/2011(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s)for exemption from complying with S.C. rules and appln.(s) forexemption from filing O.T. and Office Report)SLP(C) No. 15353/2011SLP(C) No. 17886-17890/2011SLP(C) No. 19439-19446/2011SLP(C) No. 19447-19462/2011SLP(C) No. 25485/2011SLP(C) No. 8108-8110/2013SLP(C) No. 22134-2236/2013(With applns. for c/delay in filing substitution applications,substitution applications, c/delay in filing SLPs., if any inrespective matters)Date : 20/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA 3For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. M.S. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. N.P. Midha, Adv. Mr. Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. H.P.S. Gumal, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Grover, AAG Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos. 17886-17890 of 2011 Delinked. In Rest of the matters Delay, in filing the application(s) for substitution, if any, is condoned. Application(s) for substitution, if any, is/are allowed. Delay, in filing special leave petition(s) if any, is /are condoned. 4 Leave granted. All the civil appeals are allowed in termsof the signed order.[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] Court Master Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]
1 ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10285-10358/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No. 233/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5072/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5087/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 150/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 585/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 584/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5583/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5089/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 3105/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 444/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 292/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 620/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 230/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 301/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 298/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 235/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 232/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 286/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 284/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 299/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5733/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5629/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5739/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5735/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5737/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5736/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 229/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 225/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 289/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5628/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5627/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 236/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5082/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5090/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5080/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5738/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5732/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5083/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5084/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 1379/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 300/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 222/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5079/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5075/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5042/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5731/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5734/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5074/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 287/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5078/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5085/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5306/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 279/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5094/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5095/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5308/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 443/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 227/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5305/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 220/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 237/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 226/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 223/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 293/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5091/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5182/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5077/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5093/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5092/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5081/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 307/2009,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5086/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5781/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5780/2008,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 43/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 125/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 02/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 182/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 161/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 184/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 26/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 128/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 232/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 221/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No.
2 173/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 156/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 155/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 175/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 125/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 201/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 189/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 205/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 166/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 164/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 156/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 32/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 157/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 129/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 125/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 46/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 153/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 203/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 183/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 47/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 39/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 186/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 185/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 131/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 122/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 123/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 154/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 171/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 117/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 38/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 30/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 188/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 181/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 162/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 189/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 179/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 114/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 178/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 116/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 190/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 41/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 217/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 191/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 173/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 226/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 200/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 177/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 45/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 172/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 147/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 174/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 152/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 144/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 126/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 304/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 124/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 127/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 130/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 178/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 66/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 187/1995,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 18/1996,23/08/2010 in LAC No. 15/1996 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. And permission to file SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C) Nos. 10362-10372/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 10374-10383/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 10406-10470/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)
3 SLP(C) Nos. 10480-10490/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 11411-11421/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 11422-11502/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 12044-12054/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 14449-14453/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 15314-15352/2011 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from complying with s.c. rules and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from complying with s.c. rules and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 15353/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 17886-17890/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 19439-19446/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 19447-19462/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25485/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 8108-8110/2013 (With Office Report) SLP(C) Nos. 22134-22136/2013 (With Office Report) [FOR INFORMATION AND DIRECTION] Date : 16/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
4 CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.S.P.Laler, Adv. Mr.B.K.Bangri, Adv. Mr.Sonit Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. For Respondent(s) MR.Anil Grover AAG Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on 20 th January, 2015. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar
SECTION IV B Listed on 16.01.2015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. 1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 19 PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 10285-10358, 10362-10372, 10374-10383, 10406-10470, 10480-10490, 11411-11421, 11422-11502, 12044-12054, 14449-14453, 15314-15352, 15353, 17886-90, 19439-19446, 19447-19462, 25485 of 2011 , 22134-22136 OF 2013 AND 8108-10 OF 2013 AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. (Application for Condonation of delay in filing SLP, Application for Permission to file SLP, Application for Substitution and Condonation of delay in filing Application for Substitution) WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Omkar Singh & Ors. Etc Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Haryana & Ors. Etc. Etc. Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT SLP(C) Nos. 10285-10358, 10362-10372, 10374-83, 10406-10470, 10480-10490 of 2011 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 1.4.2011, when the following order was passed:- “Delay caused in filing the special leave petitions is condoned. Issue notice on the application for permission to file the special leave petition, Special Leave Petitions, application for substitution and applications for condonation of delay in filing applications for substitution. ” SLP(C)Nos.11411-11421,11422-11502 and 12044-12054 of 2011 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.4.2011, when the following order was passed:- “Delay condoned in filing the special leave petitions.
Issue notice on the application for permission to file the special leave petitions, application for substitution and applications for condonation of delay in filing applications for substitution. Tag the instant petitions along with the SLP(C)Nos.10285-10358 of 2011 .” Service position in SLP(C) Nos. 10285-10358, 10362-10372, 10374-83, 10406-10470, 10480-10490 and 11411-11421, 11422-11502 of 2011 It is submitted that Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate for the Petitioner has on 27.05.2013 filed a letter with proof of service of matters through standing counsel for the State and HSIDC. It is further submitted that Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation(HSIDC) in SLP(C) Nos. 10285-358, 10362-72, 10374-83, 10406-47, 10480-490, 11411-421, 11422-11502 of 2011. Copy of the same are included in the SLP paper books. Service of show cause notice is complete. SLP(C) Nos. 12044-12054 of 2011 It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance and Counter Affidavit on behalf of Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation(HSIDC) in all the matters. Copy of the same are included in the SLP paper books. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps for unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 2 despite 3 weeks time granted by Ld. Registrar. Service of show cause notice is incomplete on respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
SLP(C) Nos. 14449-14453 of 2011 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.05.2011, when the following order was passed:- “Permission to file Speical Leave Petition is granted. Delay caused in filing applications for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased petitioners is condoned. Applications for substitution are allowed. Issue notice. Tag the instant matter along with SLP(C)Nos.10480-10490/2011 .” SLP(C) Nos. 15314-15352 and 15353 OF 2011 The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11.5.2011, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- "Delay condoned. Permission to file Special Leave Petitions is granted. Delay of 101 days caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives in SLP arising out of RFA No.1495/2009 is condoned. Similarly, delay of 362 days caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives in SLP arising out of RFA No.3152/2008 is condoned. Delay of 362 days caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives in SLP arising out of RFA No.3162/2008 is also condoned. Delay of 184 days caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives in SLP arising out of RFA No.4832/2009 is condoned. Delay of 149 days caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives in SLP arising out of RFA No.5304/2008 is condoned In all the matters, applications for substitution are allowed. Issue notice. Tag the instant matter along with SLP (C) Nos.10362-10372/2011."
Accordingly, show cause notice was issued by registered A.D. post on 15.06.2011 and 16.6.2011. Service position of the matters is as under:- SLP (C) No. Total RRs. Served RRs. Unserved RRs. V/A C/A filed on b/o Remarks 15314 4 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15315 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15316 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15317 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15318 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15319 5 (1-4 common) 1-5 -- 4 4 Complete 15320 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15321 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15322 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15323 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15324 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15325 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15326 5 (All Common) 1-5 -- 5 5 Complete 15327 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15328 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15329 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15330 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15331 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15332 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete
15333 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15334 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15335 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15336 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15337 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15338 4 (All Common) 1-4 -- 4 4 Complete 15339 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15340 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15341 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15342 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15343 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15344 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15345 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15346 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15347 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15348 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15349 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15350 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15351 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete 15352 3 (All Common) 1-3 -- 3 3 Complete It is further submitted that LRs. of deceased petitioner No. 20 namely Dariya in SLP(C) No. 15318 of
2011, deceased petitioner No. 2 namely Lok Ram in SLP(C) No. 15324 of 2011, deceased petitioner No. 2 namely Lok Ram in SLP(C) No. 15327 of 2011, deceased petitioner No. 6 namely Surender Singh in SLP(C) No. 15345 of 2011, deceased petitioner No. 8 namely Sahaj Ram in SLP(C) 15348 of 2011, have been brought on record vide Hon'ble Court's Order dated 11.05.2011 and correction in LRs. for substitution was allowed by order dated 20.01.2012. LRs. of deceased petitioner namely Vijay Singh in SLP(C) No. 15350 of 2011 have also been brought on record vide Hon'ble Judge(In Chamber) order dated 19.11.2014. Cause title have been amended in the SLP paper books. SLP (C) No. Total RRs. Serve d RRs. Unserved RRs. V/A C/A filed on b/o Remarks 15353/11 5 1-2 - 3-5 3-5 Complete 14449-53/11 4 (Common in all SLPs) 1-4 - - - Complete SLP Nos. 17886-90, 19439-19440 and 19447-19462 of 2011 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 06.07.2011, when the court was pleased to pass the following order: - SLP(C) Nos. 17886-90 of 2011 “Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag the instant petitions along with SLP (C) No. 10285-10358 of 2011” SLP(C) No. 19439-40 of 2011 AND 19447-62 of 2011 “ CC NO. 9360-9367/2011 Issue notice on the application seeking permission to file special leave petitions, application for condonation of delay in filing application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased Nathu Singh, application for substitution of legal representatives, application for condonation of delay in special leave petition and special leave
petition. Tag the instant petitions along with SLP(C) Nos. 8011-8049/2011. CC NO. 10672-10687 of 2011 Issue notice on the application seeking permission to file special leave petitions, for condonation of delay caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased Gurdayal Singh, Udai Singh, Kartar Singh, Chameli, Sarwan, Sanwat Singh, Surji and Birmati, application for substitution of legal representatives of the deceased whose names are mentioned above, application for condonation of delay in special leave petition and special leave petition. Tag the instant petitions along with SLP(C) No. 8011-8049/2011.” Service position is as follows :- It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to all the respondents in the instant matter on 28.11.2011 and 09.05.2012. Service of show cause notice is given as under: - SLP No. Total No. of Respondent Vakalatnama A.D . Status of service Remarks 17886 of 2011 4 R-3 - Incomplete on R-1, 2 & 4. Incomplete counter affidavit not filed on behalf of R-3. 17887 of 2011 4 R-3 - Incomplete on R-1, 2 & 4. Incomplete counter affidavit not filed on behalf of R-3. 17888 of 2011 4 R-3 - Incomplete on R-1,2, 4 Incomplete Counter not filed of R-3. 17889 of 2011 5 R-4 - Incomplete on R-1& 3,5 Incomplete. Counter affidavit of R-4 not filed. 17890 of 2011 9 R-4 - Incomplete on R-1 to 3, 5 to 13 Incomplete. Counter affidavit of R-4 not filed. Service of show cause notice is not complete.
SLP(C) Nos. 19439-19446 of 2011 It is submitted that fresh show cause notice was issued to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and 6 to 7 on 11.08.2014 but neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back so far. Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance and counter affidavit on behalf of HSIDC. Copy of the same is included in the SLP paper books. Service of show cause notice in incomplete. SLP(C) No. 19447-19462 OF 2011 It is submitted that Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate for the Petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service with proof of service upon respondent nos. 1 to 2 & respondent nos. 4 to 6 in the matter (State of Haryana). However, no one has entered appearance on their behalf so far. Mr. Ravinder Bana, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent i.e HSIDC in the matters and filed counter affidavit on their behalf. Copy of the same are included in Paper Books. It is further submitted that Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate has filed a letter dated 09.01.2014 stating therein that “proof of service of paper books with respect to respondent nos. 1 & 2 being State of Haryana and its functionaries through Standing Counsel was filed on 29.05.2012 and respondents nos. 3 & 4 being HSIDC and its functionaries have already filed their Counter Affidavit”. It is further submitted that Neither A. D. Cards nor unserved covers containing notice have been received back from Respondent Nos. 6 to 9. Service of show cause notice is not complete on rest of the respondent nos. 6 to 9. SLP(C) No. 25485 of 2011 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.08.2011, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:-
“Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on special leave petition. Tag the instant petition along with SLP(C) Nos. 15314-15352 of 2011.” It is submitted that there are total 9 respondents. In terms of Hon'ble Court's order dated 19.08.2011, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents on 11.10.2011. Respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 i.e. (HSIDC)are represented through Mr, Ravindra Bana, Advocate but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. The counsel for the petitioner has on 01.05.2012 and again on 21.02.2014 filed proof of service of copies of SLP on the standing Counsel for State of Haryana (Respondent Nos. 1 and 2) But no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Service is not complete on respondent nos. 1, 2, 6 to 9. SLP(C) Nos. 22134-22136 of 2013 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 26.07.2013, when the court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) Nos.10285-10358/2011.” It is submitted that there are 3 respondents in the matter. Common respondents in all SLPs. Mr. Ravindra Rana, Advocate has on 17.09.2013 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of respondent No. 3 but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. Mr. B. S. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner has on 21.04.2014, filed proof of service after serving show cause notice on respondent Nos. 1 & 2 on Dr. Monika Gusain advocate for State but she has not filed counter Affidavit so far.
SLP(C) Nos. 8108-8110 of 2013 The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 04.02.2013, when the court was pleased to pass the following order: - “Issue notice on the aplication for condonation of dealy as also on the special leave petitions. Tag with SLP C) No.10285-10358 of 2011 and connected matters” It is submitted that Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation(HSIDC) but he has not filed counter affidavit. It is further submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps for unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 3. Service of show cause notice is incomplete against respondent Nos. 1 and 3. The matters are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 15th day of January, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal, Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Haokip-Rajesh
ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12044-12054/2011 RAMNATH & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 19439-19446/2011 SLP(C) No. 19447-19462/2011 SLP(C) No. 25485/2011 SLP(C) No. 8108-8110/2013 SLP(C) No. 22134-22136/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 02/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sonit S.adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)No.12044-54/11 The office report states that although by order dated 15.09.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 2, yet he has not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. … ..........2
ITEM NO.21 -2- SLP(C) No.19439-19446/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.2-4, 6 & 7 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within the period provided above. List again on 16.02.2015. SLP(C) No.19447-462/2011 & 25485/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos.6-9 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioners within the period provided above. List again on 16.02.2015. SLP(C) No.8108-10/2013 The office report is that although by order dated 15.09.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the office report, yet he has not done the needful so far. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. SLP(C) No.22134-22136/2013 The respondent No.3 shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. List the matters again on 16.02.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
Ø ITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12044-12054/2011 RAMNATH & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 19439-19446/2011 SLP(C) No. 19447-19462/2011 SLP(C) No. 25485/2011 SLP(C) No. 8108-8110/2013 SLP(C) No. 22134-22136/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 02/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sonit S.adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)No.12044-54/11 The office report states that although by order dated 15.09.2014 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 2, yet he hasSignature Not Verified not done the needful so far. Viewed in that context, the matterDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.12.0410:50:11 ISTReason: shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. .............2ITEM NO.21 -2-SLP(C) No.19439-19446/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos.2-4, 6 & 7 shall be taken by the Ld.counselfor the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti inaddition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the
particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for thepetitioners within the period provided above. List again on16.02.2015.SLP(C) No.19447-462/2011 & 25485/2011 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to theunserved respondent Nos.6-9 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel forthe petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in additionis permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particularsof which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitionerswithin the period provided above. List again on 16.02.2015.SLP(C) No.8108-10/2013 The office report is that although by order dated 15.09.2014of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was given to theLd.counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of theoffice report, yet he has not done the needful so far. Therefore,the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judgein Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and listthereafter. SLP(C) No.22134-22136/2013 The respondent No.3 shall file the counter affidavit within aperiod of four weeks, whereafter no further extension shall beprovided. List the matters again on 16.02.2015. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
1 ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 59/2014, I.A. 60/2014, I.A. 61/2014, I.A. 62/2014, I.A. 63/2014, I.A. 64/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15314-15352/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5757/2008 i.e. RFA Nos. 5756/2008, RFA No. 3160/2008, RFA No. 2652/2009, RFA No. 1495/2009, RFA No. 5754/2008, RFA No. 3168/2008, RFA No. 1622/2009, RFA No. 3154/2008, RFA No. 3159/2008, RFA No. 3162/2008, RFA No. 3164/2008, RFA No. 5752/2008, RFA No. 3152/2008, RFA No. 3157/2008, RFA No. 3167/2008, RFA No. 3155/2008, RFA No. 3165/2008, RFA No. 3156/2008, RFA No. 3161/2008, RFA No. 3166/2008, RFA No. 5843/2008 and judgment and order dated 11/11/2010 in RFA Nos. 451/2010, 2114/2010 and 2115/2010 and also from the judgment and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5209/2008, RFA No. 3021/2009, RFA No. 5208/2008, RFA No. 3572/2009, RFA No. 3152/2009, RFA No. 3024/2009, RFA No. 3022/2009, RFA No. 3023/2009, RFA No. 3575/2009, RFA No. 4832/2009, RFA No. 3571/2009, RFA No. 5210/2008, RFA No. 3573/2009, RFA No. 3574/2009 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) PARTAP SINGH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and exemption from filing official translation of will and death certificate and exemption from filing O.T. and c/delay and office report) Date : 19/11/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Ms. Smita Maan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing the substitution application for bringing the
2 legal representatives of the deceased petitioner is condoned. The abatement stands set aside. The names of Jagbir Singh and Satbir Singh, sons of the deceased petitioner stands substituted in place of the deceased – petitioner. The counsel for the petitioners to file an amended memo of parties within seven days. The Registry to proceed with the matter accordingly. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
SECTION IV B Listed on. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. Ch. matter CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. INTERLOCATORY APPLICATION NOS. 59 – 64 (Applications for Substitution in respect of Deceased petitioner in SLP (C) No. 15350 of 2011, Condonation of delay in filing application for substitution and setting aside abatement, exemption from filing official translation of Annexure P-5, exemption from filing original WILL and Death Certificate, exemption from filing official translation of Will and death certificate and condonation of delay in complying with the order dated 10.03.2014 passed by Hon'ble Chamber Judge) IN PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 15314-15352 OF 2011. Sh. Partap Singh & Ors. Etc. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) on 10.03.2014 with Office Report on Default dated 28.01.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- " Perused the office report dated 28 th January, 2014. Two weeks’ time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to rectify the defects as notified by the Registry in the office report. " It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on 5.9.2012 filed an application for substitution to bring on record LRs. of sole deceased petitioner namely Vijay Singh in SLP No. 15350 of 2011 alongwith an application of condonation of delay & setting aside abatement in filing substitution application and application for exemption from filing official
translation of Annexure P-5(Colly). He has also filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance on behalf of two LRs i.e. Jagbir Singh and Satbir Singh. It is submitted that counsel has on 15.03.2014 deposited the cost of Rs 500/- with Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. Counsel has on 06.06.2014 filed applications for exemption from filing Original WILL and Death Certificate and exemption from filing official translation of WILL and Death certificate and condonation of delay in complying with the order dated 10.03.2014 passed by Hon'ble Judge(In Chamber). Counsel has stated in the Application that Vijay Singh sole deceased petitioner had expired on 13.3.2012 leaving behind their five sons namely Raghvir Singh, Dharam Singh, Satbir Singh, Jagbir Singh and Mangal Singh. His two sons namely Raghvir Singh and Mangal Singh have also died living behind their LRs. Other three sons are living separately from him and they do not render any service to him and he do not want to part with his property to them as per typed copy of “WIll” which has been filed alongwith Interlocutory Application It is further stated that according to the WILL, two sons namely Jagbir Singh and Satbir Singh are the only legal LRs. of Vijay Singh (Deceased petitioner). The Interlocutory Applications, therefore listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chamber) with this office report. Dated this the 27th day of October, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:- 1. Mr. Bankey Bihari, Adv. 2. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COM5/sau
1 ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 59/2014, I.A. 60/2014, I.A. 61/2014, I.A. 62/2014, I.A. 63/2014, I.A. 64/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15314-15352/2011 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5757/2008 i.e. RFA Nos. 5756/2008, RFA No. 3160/2008, RFA No. 2652/2009, RFA No. 1495/2009, RFA No. 5754/2008, RFA No. 3168/2008, RFA No. 1622/2009, RFA No. 3154/2008, RFA No. 3159/2008, RFA No. 3162/2008, RFA No. 3164/2008, RFA No. 5752/2008, RFA No. 3152/2008, RFA No. 3157/2008, RFA No. 3167/2008, RFA No. 3155/2008, RFA No. 3165/2008, RFA No. 3156/2008, RFA No. 3161/2008, RFA No. 3166/2008, RFA No. 5843/2008 and judgment and order dated 11/11/2010 in RFA Nos. 451/2010, 2114/2010 and 2115/2010 and also from the judgment and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No. 5209/2008, RFA No. 3021/2009, RFA No. 5208/2008, RFA No. 3572/2009, RFA No. 3152/2009, RFA No. 3024/2009, RFA No. 3022/2009, RFA No. 3023/2009, RFA No. 3575/2009, RFA No. 4832/2009, RFA No. 3571/2009, RFA No. 5210/2008, RFA No. 3573/2009, RFA No. 3574/2009 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) PARTAP SINGH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and exemption from filing official translation of will and death certificate and exemption from filing O.T. and c/delay and office report) Date : 19/11/2014 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Ms. Smita Maan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.Signature Not Verified UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the followingDigitally signed byMeenakshi KohliDate: 2014.11.2006:03:18 ISTReason: O R D E R Delay in filing the substitution application for bringing the 2legal representatives of the deceased petitioner is condoned. The abatement stands set aside. The names of Jagbir Singh and Satbir Singh, sons of the
deceased petitioner stands substituted in place of the deceased -petitioner. The counsel for the petitioners to file an amended memoof parties within seven days. The Registry to proceed with the matter accordingly.(MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
CHAMBER MATTER Matter for : 12.11.2014 Court No. 14 Item No. 4 SECTION XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4 (Application for substitution/condonation of delay in filing application for substitution) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 11442/2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS RATAN LAL PANWAR ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble JudgeinChamber on 26.09.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: " Two weeks further time is granted to the petitioners, as a last opportunity, to take out the steps in terms of the report of the Registry. It is made clear that if these steps are not taken, the special leave petition shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court ." It is submitted that Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, counsel for the petitoner has on 10.10.2014 filed an application for substitution to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased sole respondent and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution as there is a delay of 436 days in filing the same. Notice of motion has been endorsed and counsel for the petitioner has on 27.10.2014 filed proof of service of notice of motion of the three proposed legal heirs of the deceased sole respondent. Copy of the application has been included in the paper books. Service is complete. The applications abovementioned are listed before the Hon'ble JudgeinChamber with this office report. Dated this the 28 th day of October, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12044-12054/2011 RAMNATH & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 19439-19446/2011 SLP(C) No. 19447-19462/2011 SLP(C) No. 25485/2011 SLP(C) No. 8108-8110/2013 SLP(C) No. 22134-22136/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 15/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.1204-54/2013 Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 2. … .......2
ITEM NO.33 -2- SLP(C) Nos.8108-10/2013 Ld.counsel for the petitioners shall comply with the terms of the office report within a period of three weeks whereafter no further extension shall be provided. SLP(C) Nos.19439-19446/2011 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents. SLP(C) Nos. 19447-462/2011 The office report indicates that the respondent Nos. 3 & 4 have already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 5, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. These respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. Ld.counsel for the petitioners has stated that he has already filed an application for the deletion of the unserved respondents. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. In case, any such application seen to have been is filed, in that event, the same shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. SLP(C) Nos.25485/2011 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 6 to 9. The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. SLP(C) No.22134-22136/2013 Ld.counsel for the respondents shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be provided. List again on 2.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
² ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12044-12054/2011 RAMNATH & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 19439-19446/2011 SLP(C) No. 19447-19462/2011 SLP(C) No. 25485/2011 SLP(C) No. 8108-8110/2013 SLP(C) No. 22134-22136/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 15/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.1204-54/2013 Three weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 2.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.09.1710:39:26 ISTReason: ..........2ITEM NO.33 -2- SLP(C) Nos.8108-10/2013 Ld.counsel for the petitioners shall comply with the terms ofthe office report within a period of three weeks whereafter nofurther extension shall be provided. SLP(C) Nos.19439-19446/2011 Await the return of the service of notice already issued to
the unserved respondents. SLP(C) Nos. 19447-462/2011 The office report indicates that the respondent Nos. 3 & 4have already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice iscomplete on the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 5, but no one has enteredappearance on their behalf. These respondents shall be at libertyto file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, incase they intend to do so, whereafter no further extension shallbe provided. Ld.counsel for the petitioners has stated that he has alreadyfiled an application for the deletion of the unserved respondents.Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. In case,any such application seen to have been is filed, in that event, thesame shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers. SLP(C) Nos.25485/2011 Await the return of the service of notice already issued tothe respondent Nos. 6 to 9. The served respondents shall be atliberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of fourweeks, in case they intend to do so, whereafter no furtherextension shall be provided. SLP(C) No.22134-22136/2013 Ld.counsel for the respondents shall file the counteraffidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no furtherextension shall be provided. List again on 2.12.2014. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
à ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12044-12054/2011 RAMNATH & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and permission to file slp and substitution and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 19439-19446/2011 (With prayer for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 19447-19462/2011 (With prayer for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 25485/2011 (With prayer for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 8108-8110/2013 (With prayer for Office Report) SLP(C) No. 22134-22136/2013 (With prayer for Office Report) Date : 11/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Sonit,adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta ,Adv. Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S. K. Sabharwal ,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana ,Adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.07.14 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following10:15:45 ISTReason: O R D E R ..........2ITEM NO.44 -2- SLP(C) Nos. 12044-12054/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps for theservice of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 & 2. He shalldo the needful within a period of three weeks, failing whichappropriate orders shall follow on the next date.
8108-8110/2013 Two weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel forthe petitioner to comply with the terms of the office report. SLP(C) No.19439-19446/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps for theservice of notice to the unserved respondent Nos. 2-4 and 6-7. Heshall do the needful within a period of three weeks, failing whichappropriate orders shall follow on the next date. SLP(C) Nos.19447-462/2011 & 25485/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps for theservice of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.6-9 in both thematters. He shall do the needful within a period of three weeks,failing which appropriate orders shall follow on the next date. SLP(C) No.22134-136/2013 Four weeks time to file the counter affidavit is given to theLd.counsel for the respondent No.3 Dr.Monika Gusain,Ld.advocate shall file the vakalatnama andthe counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 withina period of three weeks. List again on 15.09.2014. (M K HANJURA) RegistrarSB
ìITEM NO.43 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15314-15352/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No.3152/2008,RFANo.3154/2008,RFA No.3155/2008,RFA No.3156/2008,RFA No.3157/2008,RFANo.3159/2008,RFA No.3160/2008,RFA No.3161/2008,RFA No.3162/2008,RFANo.3164/2008,RFA No.3165/2008,RFA No.3166/2008,RFA No.3167/2008,RFANo.3168/2008,RFA No.5208/2008,RFA No.5209/2008,RFA No.5210/2008,RFANo.5752/2008,RFA No.5754/2008,RFA No.5756/2008,RFA No.5757/2008,RFANo.5843/2008,RFA No.1495/2009,RFA No.1622/2009,RFA No.2652/2009,RFANo.3021/2009,RFA No.3022/2009,RFA No.3023/2009,RFA No.3024/2009,RFANo.3152/2009,RFA No.3571/2009,RFA No.3572/2009,RFA No.3573/2009,RFANo.3574/2009,RFA No.3575/2009,RFA No.4832/2009 dated 11/11/2010 in RFANo.451/2010,RFA No.2114/2010,RFA No.2115/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)PARTAP SINGH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report on default)Date: 10/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing learned counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the office report dated 28th January, 2014. Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to rectify the defects as notified by the Registry in the office report. |(Neetu Khajuria) |(S.S.R. Krishna) ||Sr.P.A. |Assistant Registrar |
¶ITEM NO.48 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 12044-12054/2011RAMNATH & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln.,permission to fileSLP,substitution and office report)WITHSLP(C) NO.19439-19446/2011SLP(C) NO.19447-19462/2011SLP(C) NO.17886-17890/2011SLP(C) NO.25485/2011SLP(C) NO.8108-8110/2013SLP(C) NO.22134-22136/2013Date: 20/02/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr Bankey Bihari, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Imran Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP (C)No. 17886-17890 of 2011, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber with appropriate office report on default. In all other matters, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. .2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks service of notice on the standing counsel for the State of Haryana. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate, takes notice for the State. In SLP (C)No. 19447-19462 of 2011, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed an application to treat the service as complete. Office to process the application. List on 11.07.2014.
| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||na | |Registrar |
ÐITEM NO.21 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K.HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12044-12054/2011RAMNATH & ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln.,permission to fileSLP,substitution and office report )WITHSLP(C) NO.19439-19446/2011SLP(C) NO.19447-19462/2011SLP(C) NO.17886-17890/2011SLP(C) NO.25485/2011SLP(C) NO.8108-8110/2013SLP(C) NO.22134-22136/2013Date: 08/01/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr Bankey Bihari, ADv. Mr Imran Ahmad Abbasi, Adv. Mr Gagan Gupta, Adv. Mr Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr S.K.Sabharwal, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr Ritesh Khatri, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) NO.12044-12054/2011, 8108-8110/2013 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. Mr Manjit Singh, the ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of therespondents. He seeks four weeks' time to file the vakalatnama and thecounter affidavit. Time as prayed for is given to him. -2-Item No.21SLP(C) NO.17886-17890/2011 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. Mr Anil Antil, the ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of therespondent Nos. 1 and 2. He seeks four weeks' time to file the vakalatnamaand the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is given to him. The other served respondents may file the counter affidavit beforethe next date in case they choose to do so. By order dt.18.11.2013 last opportunity for filing the freshparticulars of the respondent Nos. 6,8,10,11 was given to the ld. Counselfor the petitioner but he has not done the needful so far. Therefore,office report in default shall be listed before the Hon'ble Judge inChambers for further future directions.SLP(C) NO.19439-19446,19447-19462,25485 of 2011
The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. Mr Manjit Singh, the ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of therespondent Nos. 1 and 2. He seeks four weeks' time to file the vakalatnamaand the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is given to him. Await the return of the service of the notice already issued to therespondent Nos. 6 to 9.SLP(C) NO.22134-22136/2013 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. Mr Manjit Singh, the ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of therespondent Nos. 1 and 2. He seeks four weeks' time to file the vakalatnamaand the counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is given to him. -3-Item No.21 Service is complete as against the respondent No.3 but no one hasentered appearance on his behalf. The said respondent may also file thecounter affidavit within the period stipulated above in case he chooses todo so. List again on 20.2.2014.| | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
ÞITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,c/delay in filing substitutionappln.,substitution and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 22134-22136 of 2013(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report) contd......2ITEM NO.11 -2-SLP(C) NO. 8108-8110 of 2013(With office report)Date: 18/11/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr. Gagan Gupta Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri Mr. Ravindra Bana Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Abhinav Jain,adv. Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents in SLP(C) Nos.12044-54/11, 8108-10/13, 19439-46/11, 19447-462/11, 25485/11 and 22134-136/13. In SLP(C) No.17886-90/11 petitioner is directed to take fresh step in correct address as a last chance. In all other matters, service is complete. List the matters before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. Contd....2 ITEM NO.11 -2- In SLP(C) No.15350/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks two more weeks time to cure the defects in the I.A. Cure the defects as a last chance. List the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers thereafter. List the incomplete matters on 8.01.2014.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
ìITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 22134-22136 of 2013(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.7 -2-SLP(C) NO. 8108-8110 of 2013(With office report)Date: 09/09/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Ridhima Bansal,adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Sonit,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Mr. Bankey BihariFor Respondent(s)
Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri Dr.Monika Gusain,adv. Mr.Shubham Bhalla,adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.17886-890/11 Ld.counsel for the ept seeks service of notice on the unserved respondents through the District Court concerned. Furnish the correct address of the District Court through which the notice is to be sent. Take steps. Issue notice directly to the Court concerned. Await service report. In SLP(C) No.15350/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner who was directed to cure the defects in the substitution application as a last chance seeks four more weeks time. Contd....3 ITEM NO.7 -3- However, I am inclined to grant four more weeks time subject to the condition that he cures the defects and deposits a sum of Rs. 500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost within four weeks. If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. In all other cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing their vakalatnama and counter affidavit. List the matter on 18.11.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
öITEM NO.22 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.22134-22136/2013(From the judgement and order dated 21/01/2013 in RFA No.5104/2008 andjudgment and order dated 21/01/2013 in RFA No.5101/2008 & RFA No.5107/2008of the HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)BALU RAM (D) THR LRS AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date:26/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. Sonit,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag with SLP(C) Nos.10285-10358/2011. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
zITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 8108-8110 of 2013(With office report)Date: 22/07/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. ...2/-Item No.12 : 2 :For Petitioner(s) Mr. Imran Ahmad Abbasi,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv.
Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr. K.M. Gupta,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On behalf of Mr. Gagan Gupta, advocate it is submitted that he has filed an application in cases wherein he is appearing for the petitioner, service is complete. Office to verify and put up. In SLP(C)No.17886-90/2011 notices addressed to respondent 6,8,10 and 11 havee been returned unserved Counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in correct address. In SLP(C)No.15314-15352/2011 the substitution application is still defective in SLP(C)No.15350/2011. Ld. counsel for the petitioner therein is directed to cure the defects within four week as a last chance. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matters on 9.9.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 8108-8110 of 2013(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.8 -2-Date: 23/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Imran Ahmad,adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Mr. Bankey Bihari
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is incomplete in all the matters except SLP(C) No.15353/11. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against each of the case in which service remains incomplete. Ld.counsel seeks permission to serve notice on the standing counsel of the respective State and/or their officers. Permitted. Serve notice on the Standing counsel for the Corporation/department and file proof. List the matter on 22.07.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
´ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR N.J.JAMADARPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.16 -2-SLP(C) NO. 8108-8110 of 2013(With office report)Date: 01/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr.Siddharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal
Mr.Anant K.Vatsya,adv. Mr. Bankey BihariFor Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matter on 23.04.2013.| | |(N.J.JAMADAR) || | |Registrar |SB
$ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 (CC 3002-3003/2013)(From the judgement and order dated 27/05/2011 in RFA No.152/2011, orderdated 24/05/2012 in RFA No.1717/2011 and order dated 29/11/2012 in RFANo.374/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)JANTA KALYAN SAMITI ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)With I.A.1-2 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 04/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Shish Pal Laler, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the applications for condonation of delay asalso on the special leave petitions. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.10285-10358 of 2011 and connected matters. (Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master
\226ITEM NO.20 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report)Date: 16/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. ...2/-Item No.20 : 2 : Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.
Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. All the served respondents are granted four more weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matters on 1.3.2013.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
NITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.32 -2-Date: 23/11/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Saurabh Gupta,adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Mr. Gagan Gupta,adv. Mr.Anant Kumar Vatsya,adv. Mr. Bankey BihariFor Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.
Mr. Ritesh Khatri Mr.Siddhart Mittal,adv. Mr.S.K.Sabharwal,adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr.R.C.Kaushik,adv. Mr.Balbir Singh Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four more weeks time for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) Nos.15314/11 and connected cases the substitution application in relation to respondent No.5 is defective. The petitioner therein is directed to cure the defects. List the matter on 16.01.2013. | | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
æITEM NO.15 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos. 46-49 & 50 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10374-10383/2011(From the judgment and order dated 23/08/2010 in CO No.77/2008, CONo.125/2008, RFA No.1625/2008, RFA No.1689/2008, RFA No.1834/2008, RFANo.5050/2008, RFA No.5148/2008, RFA No.5576/2008, RFA No.4622/2009, RFANo.4629/2009, CO No.119/2010, CO No.121/2010 and order dated 30/08/2010 in RFA No.4614/2009,CONo.125/2010 dated 28/10/2010 in RFA No.5060/2008 of The HIGH COURT OFPUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)UMRAO & ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With application for deletion of respondents and discharge fromguardianship and office report)Date: 09/11/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The prayer seeking deletion of proforma respondents is allowed.| ||Since the petitioner No. 4 has become a major, petitioner No. 2 is ||discharged as guardian of petitioner No. 4. It will be open to the ||petitioner No. 4 to execute a separate vakalatnama in favour of the counsel ||of his choice. ||All the applications stand allowed. || ||[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SNEH LATA SHARMA] ||COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |
ìITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A.No.44 InPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10362-10372/2011BALBIR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for deletion of respondents and office report )Date: 27/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA IN CHAMBERSFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Saurabh Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG.(Har.)for State Mrs. Vivekta Singh,Adv. Mr. Tarjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, names of respondent Nos. 5 to 8 in SLP(C)No. 10370 of 2011 be deleted from the array of the parties at the risk of the petitioners. I.A. No. 44 is allowed. [SUMAN WADHWA] [S.S.R. KRISHNA] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
úITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report)Date: 27/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Saurabh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. ...2/-Item No.44 : 2 : Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await orders in the application for deletion in the SLPs. List the matters on 23.11.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
|ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report) contd...2ITEM NO.19 -2-Date: 17/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Ajit Kadyan,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr.Sidharth Mittal,adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Mr. Gagan Gupta
Ms.Smita Maan,adv. Mr. Bankey BihariFor Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) Nos.14449-53/11 notice of HSIIDC has been served on Mr.Ravindra Bana in Court. Granted four weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Hence, service is complete. Service is complete in SLP(C) No.15353/11. In all other cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four more weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 27.09.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
BITEM NO.42 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report)Date: 06/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. ...2/-Item No.42 : 2 : Mr. Shishpal Laler Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv.
Mr. Manjit Singh,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is seen that in SLP(C)No.14449-53/2011 HSIIDC has not been served. It is submitted that Mr. Rabindra Bana, advocate is appearing for that respondent in other cases. In that case Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve notice on the above counsel to complete the service. Await return of notice of respondent No. 6 to 9 in SLP(C)No.25485/2011 also. The remaining respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matters on 17.8.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
îITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report)Date: 18/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Saurabh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. ...2/-Item No.17 : 2 : Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Siddarth Mittal,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Ms. Smita Maan,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C)No.14449-53/2011 Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of the pleadings has been served on Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG for the State. The above respondent granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. It is submitted by the Ld. counsel for the petitioner in SLP(C)No.17886 to 17890/2011 that the needful has been done. Office to process it accordingly. In all other remaining cases counsel for the petitioner in each of the case granted three weeks time to serve copy of the pleadings on Mr. Manjit Singh, AAG for the Statse of Haryana and file proof. The State shall file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks thereafter. List the matters on 6.7.2012. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
JITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report)Date: 13/03/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday. contd....2ITEM NO.57 -2-For Petitioner(s) Mr.Saurabh Gupta,adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Ms.Smita Maan,adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four more weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. Mr.Manjit Singh on behalf of Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta appears for the State of Haryana in few cases. In all the cases in which State of Haryana is unserved, Ld.counsel for the petitioner in each of the case is permitted to serve notice on the above Standing Counsel and file proof. Take steps within four weeks as a last chance. Await. List the matter on 18.04.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
¦ITEM NO.38 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report) contd.....2ITEM NO.38 -2-Date: 25/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Mr. Bankey BihariFor Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 13.03.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
\200ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO. 58 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).15314-15352/2011PARTAP SINGH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to carry out correction/rectificationin substitution application and office report )Date: 20/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA (In chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Ms. Sunita Maan, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application to carry out correction/rectification in substitution application is allowed subject to the objection, if any, which may be raised by the respondent. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Neelam Arora) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.43 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 25485 of 2011(With office report) contd....2ITEM NO.43 -2-Date: 12/12/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr. S.K. Sabharwal Mr. Bankey BihariFor Respondent(s)
Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) Nos.10285-358/11 and connected cases await return of notice of the unserved respondents. In SLP(C) Nos.14449-14453/11 await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. In SLP(C) No.15353/11 await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 & 2. In SLP(C) Nos.15314-15352/11 await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6. In SLP(C) Nos.19439-446/11 await return of respondent Nos. 2-4, 6 and 7. Respondent No.5 has filed vakalatnama and counter affidavit. In SLP(C) Nos.19447-19462/11 service is complete. Respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit if any. Contd.....3 ITEM NO.43 -3- In SLP(C) No.25485/11 await return of notice of all the respondents. It is seen that vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of HSIDC but it is executed by HSIDC, Panchkula though the respondents are HSIDC, Chandigarh, Gurgaon and Rewari. The counsel who has filed vakalatnama to clarify which among the above respondents, vakalatnama has been filed. List the matters on 25.01.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
X 1ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 237-239/2011 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11422-11502/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/08/2010 in CO No. 78/2008 & CONo. 79/2008 & CO No. 80/2008 & CO No. 82/2008 & CO No. 90/2008 & CO No.109/2010 & CO No. 110/2010 & CO No. 111/2010 & CO No. 114/2010 & CO No.116/2010 & CO No. 117/2010 & CO No. 122/2010 & CO No. 150/2010 & RFANo. 218/2009 & RFA No. 219/2009 & RFA No. 224/2009 & RFA No. 228/2009 &RFA No. 231/2009 & RFA No. 261/2009 & RFA No. 281/2009 & RFA No.285/2009 & RFA No. 288/2009 & RFA No. 290/2009 & RFA No. 291/2009 & RFANo. 302/2009 & RFA No. 445/2009 & RFA No. 1577/2008 & RFA No. 1688/2008& RFA No. 1748/2008 & RFA No. 1765/2008 & RFA No. 1833/2008 & RFA No.2035/2009 & RFA No. 2666/2008 & RFA No. 2951/2009 & RFA No. 3276/2008 &RFA No. 3352/2008 & RFA No. 3353/2008 & RFA No. 3354/2008 & RFA No.3355/2008 & RFA No. 3356/2008 & RFA No. 3358/2008 & RFA No. 3359/2008 &RFA No. 3360/2008 & RFA No. 3361/2008 & RFA No. 3362/2008 & RFA No.3363/2008 & RFA No. 3364/2008 & RFA No. 3366/2008 & RFA No. 3367/2008 &RFA No. 3368/2008 & RFA No. 3369/2008 & RFA No. 3372/2008 & RFA No.3373/2008 & RFA No. 3374/2008 & RFA No. 3375/2008 & RFA No. 3376/2008& RFA No. 3377/2008 & RFA No. 3378/2008 & RFA No. 3379/2008 & RFA No.3689/2008 & RFA No. 4619/2009 & RFA No. 4620/2009 & RFA No. 4621/2009 &RFA No. 4624/2009 & RFA No. 4625/2009 & RFA No. 4627/2009 & RFA No.4628/2009 & RFA No. 4631/2009 & RFA No. 5051/2008 & RFA No. 5052/2008 &RFA No. 5053/2008 & RFA No. 5054/2008 & RFA No. 5055/2008 & RFA No.5056/2008 & RFA No. 5057/2008 & RFA No. 5059/2008 & RFA No. 5145/2008 &RFA No. 5146/2008 & RFA No. 5147/2008 & RFA No. 5149/2008 & RFA No.5150/2008 & RFA No. 5151/2008 & RFA No. 5152/2008 & RFA No. 5153/2008 &RFA No. 5271/2008 & RFA No. 5309/2008 & RFA No. 5314/2008 & RFA No.5584/2008 & RFA No. 5585/2008 & RFA No. 5586/2008 & RFA No. 5599/2008 &RFA No. 5644/2008 & RFA No. 5849/2008 & RFA No. 5850/2008 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GOKAL SINGH & ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(for discharge of Guardian and office report)Date: 15/11/2011 These Interlocutory Applications in the Petitions were called on for hearing today. 2CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Tarun Shanker Bhardwaj, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Interlocutory Application Nos. 237-239/2011 : For the reasons stated in the application, prayer in terms of (a) and (b) is granted. Necessary correction be made in the cause title within two weeks from today. Interlocutory Application Nos. 240-245/2011 : for the reasons stated in the application, prayer in terms of (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F) is granted. Amended cause title shall be filed within two weeks from today. (Rajesh Dham) (Renu Diwan) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.44 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 17886-17890 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19439-19446 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)Date: 09/11/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. ...2/-Item No.44 : 2 : Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Shishpal Laler,Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matters on 12.12.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
0 1ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos.45-46 & 47 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11411-11421/2011(From the judgement and order(s) dated 23/08/2010 in RFANo.1566/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No.1618/2008,23/08/2010 in RFANo.2926/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No.2970/2008,23/08/2010 in RFANo.3015/2008,23/08/2010 in RFA No.3703/2008,23/08/2010 in RFANo.5322/2008,22/09/2010 in RFA No.2590/2009,22/09/2010 in RFANo.2591/2009,30/08/2010 in RFA No.4615/2009,23/08/2010 in RFANo.4626/2009,23/08/2010 in CO No.112/2010,30/08/2010 in CONo.146/2010,22/09/2010 in CO No.167/201 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB& HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)ARJUN & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARYANA STATE INDUST.DEVL.CORP.LTD.ETC. Respondent(s)(for deletion of proforma respondents and discharge of Guardian andoffice report)Date: 21/10/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Shanker, Adv.for Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applications for deletion of proforma respondents from the array of parties are allowed at the 2risk and responsibility of the petitioners. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks. The application for discharge of guardian shall beconsidered at the time of hearing of the special leavepetitions.
(Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master
¢ITEM NO.4 Court No.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 237-239 & 240-245 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11422-11502/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/08/2010 in CO No.78/2008 , CONo.79/2008, CO No.80/2008, CO No.82/2008, CO No.90/2008, RFANo.1577/2008, RFA No.3352/2008, RFA No.3353/2008, RFA No.3354/2008,RFA No.3355/2008, RFA No.3356/2008, RFA No.3358/2008, RFANo.3359/2008, RFA No.3360/2008, RFA No.3361/2008, RFA No.3362/2008,RFA No.3363/2008, RFA No.3364/2008, RFA No.3366/2008, RFANo.3367/2008, RFA No.3368/2008, RFA No.3369/2008, RFA No.3372/2008,RFA No.3373/2008, RFA No.3374/2008, RFA No.3375/2008, RFANo.3376/2008, RFA No.3377/2008, RFA No.3378/2008, RFA No.3379/2008,RFA No.3689/2008, RFA No.5051/2008, RFA No.5052/2008, RFANo.5053/2008, RFA No.5054/2008, RFA No.5055/2008, RFA No.5056/2008,RFA No.5057/2008, RFA No.5145/2008, RFA No.5146/2008, RFANo.5147/2008, RFA No.5149/2008, RFA No.4619/2009, RFA No.4620/2009,RFA No.4621/2009, RFA No.4624/2009, RFA No.4625/2009, RFANo.4627/2009, RFA No.4628/2009, RFA No.4631/2009, CO No.109/2010, CONo.110/2010, CO No.111/2010, CO No.114/2010, CO No.116/2010, CONo.117/2010, CO No.122/2010, CO No.150/2010 of The HIGH COURT OFPUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)GOKAL SINGH & ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for discharge of guardian & deletion of the nameof respondent and office report)Date: 12/10/2011 These applications were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Post the matter before the regular Court on 15.11.2011. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (SHARDA KAPOOR)Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)Date: 26/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta contd....2ITEM NO.50 -2- Mr.Shish Pal Laler,adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik Mr. Bankey BihariFor Respondent(s) Ms.Vibha Narang,adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Await return of notice of unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 9.11.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.80 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19439-19446/2011BHADUR SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 19447-19462 of 2011(With office report)Date: 23/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Gagan GuptaFor Respondent(s) Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.19439-19446/11 respondent Nos. 1 & 5 have been served. Respondent No.1 takes notice through Mr.Manjit Singh. No appearance for respondent No.5. Await return of notice of the remaining respondents. Contd...2 ITEM NO.80 -2- In SLP(C)Nos.19447-19462/11 await return of notice of all the respondents. List the matter on 11.11.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
´ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.14 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA Nos.30-32 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10480-10490/2011RAJWAN @ SARWAN(D) TR.LRS.& ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(for deletion of proforma respondents and office report)Date: 19/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No objection by the learned counsel appearing for the non-applicants. Consequently, the Applications for deletion of the names of proforma respondents in terms of prayer (a) to (c) of the applications are allowed at the risk and responsibility of the applicants and subject to just exceptions. The names of proforma respondents are deleted from the array of parties at the risk and responsibility of the applicants. Office to list the matter before the Court as per rules.(Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Harjinder Kaur) Court Master Court Master
âITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).10285-10358/2011OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP,substitution,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report ))WITH SLP(C) NO. 10362-10372 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 10374-10383 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10406-10470 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 10480-10490 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 11411-11421 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 11422-11502 of 2011(With prayer for interim relief and office report)SLP(C) NO. 12044-12054 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 14449-14453 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15314-15352 of 2011(With office report)SLP(C) NO. 15353 of 2011(With office report)Date: 26/08/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. ..2/-Item No.71 : 2 :For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Bana,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is submitted by the Ld. counsel for the petitioner that respondents are common in all the cases. It is seen that some of the respondents have bee served and Vakalatnama filed. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing Vakalatnama and counter
affidavit. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matters on 26.9.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
(ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 (CC 13085/2011)(From the judgement and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No.5034/2008of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)UMRAO SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 19/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on special leave petition. Tag the instant petition along with SLP(C) Nos. 15314-15352 of 2011. (Sonia) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P. A. Court Master
^ 1ITEM NO.14 + 46 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 9360-9367/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/08/2010 in RFA No. 3365/2008& RFA No. 3370/2008 & RFA No. 3675/2008 & RFA No. 3682/2008 & RFANo. 3700/2008 & RFA No. 3702/2008 & RFA No. 3704/2008 & RFA No.3705/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)BHADUR SINGH & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report )WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 10672-10687 of 2011(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay infiling substitution appln. and office report )Date: 06/07/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Adv. Mr. S.K. Sabharwal,Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R CC NO. 9360-9367/2011 Issue notice on the application seeking permission to file special leave petitions, application for condonation of delay in filing 2 application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased Nathu Singh, application for substitution of legal representatives, application for condonation of delay in special leave petition and special leave petition. Tag the instant petitions along with SLP(C) Nos. 8011-8049/2011.CC NO. 10672-10687 of 2011 Issue notice on the application seeking permission to file special leave petitions, for condonation of delay caused in filing application
for substitution of legal representatives of deceased Gurdayal Singh, Udai Singh, Kartar Singh, Chameli, Sarwan, Sanwat Singh, Surji and Birmati, application for substitution of legal representatives of the deceased whose names are mentioned above, application for condonation of delay in special leave petition and special leave petition. Tag the instant petitions along with SLP(C) No. 8011-8049/2011. (Sonia) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P. A. Court Master
¢ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 8011-8049/2011(From the judgement and order dated 11/11/2010 in RFA No.451/2010 & RFA No. 2114/2010 & RFA No. 2115/2010 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)PARTAP SINGH & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)(For substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 8117 of 2011(For substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)Date: 11/05/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari,Adv. Mr. B. S. Maan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Permission to file Special Leave Petitions is granted. Delay of 101 days caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives in SLP arising out of RFA No.1495/2009 is condoned. Similarly, delay of 362 days caused in filing application for substitution of legal representatives - 2 -in SLP arising out of RFA No.3152/2008 is condoned.Delay of 362 days caused in filing application forsubstitution of legal representatives in SLP arisingout of RFA No.3162/2008 is also condoned. Delay of184 days caused in filing application forsubstitution of legal representatives in SLP arisingout of RFA No.4832/2009 is condoned. Delay of 149days caused in filing application for substitution oflegal representatives in SLP arising out of RFANo.5304/2008 is condoned In all the matters, applications for substitutionare allowed. Issue notice. Tag the instant matter along with SLP (C)Nos.10362-10372/2011.(Neetu Sachdeva) (Sneh Bala Mehra)
Sr. P. A. Court Master
ÌITEM NO.12 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 7666-7670/2011(From the judgement and order dated 14/09/2010 in RFA No.4115/2009 & RFA No. 4119/2009 & RFA No. 4120/2009 & RFA No.4121/2009 & RFA No. 4123/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)DEVI LAL & ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)(For substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)Date: 09/05/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Adv. Mr. R.C. Kaushik,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file Special Leave Petitions is granted. Delay caused in filing applications for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased petitioners is condoned. Applications for substitution are allowed. Issue notice. Tag the instant matter along with SLP (C) Nos.10480-10490/2011. (Neetu Sachdeva) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P. A. Court Master
V 1ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 6170-6180/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/08/2010 in CO No.112/2010 & CO No. 146/2010 & CO No. 167/2010 & RFA No. 1566/2008& RFA No. 1618/2008 & RFA No. 2590/2009 & RFA No. 2591/2009 & RFANo. 2926/2008 & RFA No. 2970/2008 & RFA No. 3015/2008 & RFA No.3703/2008 & RFA No. 4615/2009 & RFA No. 4626/2009 & RFA No.5322/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)ARJUN & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSHARYANA STATE INDUST.DEVL.CORP.LTD.ETC. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for substitution,permission to file SLP, c/delayin filing substitution appln. and prayer for interim relief andoffice report)WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6349-6359 of 2011(For substitution, permission to file SLP, c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 6372-6452 of 2011(For substitution, permission to file SLP, c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and prayer for interim relief and officereport)Date: 15/04/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhim Kumar B, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Adv.For Respondent(s) 2 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in filing the special leavepetitions. Issue notice on the applications forpermission to file the special leave petitions,applications for substitution and applications forcondonation of delay in filing applications forsubstitution.
Tag the instant petitions along with theSLP(C) Nos. 10285-10358 of 2011. (Sonia) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P. A. Court Master
¾'ITEM NO.14 + 42 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 5128-5201/2011(From the judgement and order dated 23/08/2010 in LAC No. 2/1996& LAC No. 15/1996 & LAC No. 18/1996 & LAC No. 26/1996 & LAC No.30/1996 & LAC No. 32/1996 & LAC No. 38/1996 & LAC No. 39/1996 &LAC No. 41/1996 & LAC No. 43/1996 & LAC No. 45/1996 & LAC No.46/1996 & LAC No. 47/1996 & LAC No. 66/1996 & LAC No. 114/1995 &LAC No. 116/1995 & LAC No. 117/1995 & LAC No. 122/1995 & LAC No.123/1995 & LAC No. 124/1995 & LAC No. 125/1995 & LAC No. 125/1996& LAC No. 126/1995 & LAC No. 127/1995 & LAC No. 128/1995 & LACNo. 129/1995 & LAC No. 130/1995 & LAC No. 131/1995 & LAC No.144/1996 & LAC No. 147/1996 & RFA No. 150/2009 & LAC No. 152/1996& LAC No. 153/1996 & LAC No. 154/1995 & LAC No. 155/1996 & LACNo. 156/1995 & LAC No. 156/1996 & LAC No. 157/1995 & LAC No. 161/1995 & LAC No. 162/1995 & LAC No. 164/1996 & LAC No.166/1996 & LAC No. 171/1995 & LAC No. 172/1996 & LAC No. 173/1995& LAC No. 173/1996 & LAC No. 174/1996 & LAC No. 175/1996 & LACNo. 177/1996 & LAC No. 178/1995 & LAC No. 178/1996 & LAC No.179/1995 & LAC No. 181/1995 & LAC No. 182/1995 & LAC No. 183/1996& LAC No. 184/1995 & LAC No. 185/1995 & LAC No. 186/1995 & LAC No. 187/1995 & LAC No. 188/1995 & LAC No. 189/1995 & LAC No.189/1996 & LAC No. 190/1995 & LAC No. 191/1995 & LAC No. 200/1996& LAC No. 201/1996 & LAC No. 203/1996 & LAC No. 205/1996 & LACNo. 217/1996 & RFA No. 220/2009 & LAC No. 221/1996 & RFA No.222/2009 & RFA No. 223/2009 & RFA No. 225/2009 & LAC No. 226/1996 & RFA No. 226/2009 & RFA No. 227/2009 & RFA No.229/2009 & RFA No. 230/2009 & LAC No. 232/1996 & RFA No. 232/2009& RFA No. 233/2009 & RFA No. 235/2009 & RFA No. 236/2009 & RFANo. 237/2009 & RFA No. 279/2009 & RFA No. 284/2009 & RFA No.286/2009 & RFA No. 287/2009 & RFA No. 289/2009 & RFA No. 292/2009& RFA No. 293/2009 & RFA No. 298/2009 & RFA No. 299/2009 & RFA No. 300/2009 & RFA No. 301/2009 & LAC No. 304/1996 & RFA No.307/2009 & RFA No. 443/2009 & RFA No. 444/2009 & RFA No. 584/2009& RFA No. 585/2009 & RFA No. 620/2009 & RFA No. 1379/2009 & RFANo. 3105/2009 & RFA No. 5042/2008 & RFA No. 5072/2008 & RFA No.5074/2008 & RFA No. 5075/2008 & RFA No. 5077/2008 & RFA No.5078/2008 & RFA No. 5079/2008 & RFA No. 5080/2008 & RFA No. 5081/2008 & RFA No. 5082/2008 & RFA No. 5083/2008 & RFA No.5084/2008 & RFA No. 5085/2008 & RFA No. 5086/2008 & RFA No.5087/2008 & RFA No. 5089/2008 & RFA No. 5090/2008 & RFA No.5091/2008 & RFA No. 5092/2008 & RFA No. 5093/2008 & RFA No. 5094/2008 & RFA No. 5095/2008 & RFA No. 5182/2008 & RFANo. 5305/2008 & RFA No. 5306/2008 & RFA No. 5308/2008 & RFA No.5583/2008 & RFA No. 5627/2008 & RFA No. 5628/2008 & RFA No.5629/2008 & RFA No. 5731/2008 & RFA No. 5732/2008 & RFA No.5733/2008 & RFA No. 5734/2008 & RFA No. 5735/2008 & RFA No. 5736/2008 & RFA No. 5737/2008 & RFA No. 5738/2008 & RFA No.5739/2008 & RFA No. 5780/2008 & RFA No. 5781/2008 of The HIGHCOURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) - 2 -OMKAR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)(For substitution,permission to file SLP,c/delay in filingsubstitution appln. and office report)SLP (C)...... CC 5215-5225/2011(With appln. (s) for permission to file SLP, substitution,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)SLP (C)...... CC 5256-5266/2011(With appln. (s) for permission to file SLP, substitution,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and office report)SLP (C)...... CC 5931-5940/2011(With appln. (s) for permission to file SLP, substitution,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and with prayer for interim relief
and office report)SLP (C)...... CC 5798-5862/2011(With appln. (s) for permission to file SLP, substitution,c/delayin filing substitution appln. and with prayer for interim reliefand office report)Date: 01/04/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. J. L. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv. Mr. M. S. Yadav, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay caused in filing Special Leave Petitions is condoned. Issue notice on the applications for permission to file Special Leave Petition, Special Leave Petitions, applications for substitution and condonation of delay in filing applications for substitution. (Neetu Sachdeva) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P. A. Court Master