K. Lakshman Rao vs Canara Bank — WP/14027/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 06th November 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010258102023

Filing Number

WP/19937/2023

Filing Date

06-Jun-2023

Registration No

WP/14027/2023

Registration Date

06-Jun-2023

Judge

Surepalli Nanda

Coram

Surepalli Nanda

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

CANARA BANK ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

06-Nov-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K. Lakshman Rao

    Adv. C M R VELU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank

  2. 2.Canara Bank

    Adv. A KRISHNAM RAJU

  3. 3.Canara Bank

  4. 4.Canara Bank

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court allowed the writ petition and directed Canara Bank to reconsider its decision setting the pension effective date as 09.02.2023 instead of 24.12.2010 (the date the petitioner originally opted for pension). The court found that the bank failed to comply with its amended clarification order dated 14.12.2022, which explicitly stated pension should be granted "with prospective effect from the date of application made by the petitioner," and directed the bank to reconsider within three weeks while providing the petitioner a personal hearing in accordance with natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Aug-2025

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

  4. 22-Aug-2025

    For Orders

    Surepalli Nanda

  5. 22-Aug-2025

    For Orders

    Surepalli Nanda

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

  7. 19-Aug-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  8. 18-Aug-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  9. 13-Aug-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  10. 06-Aug-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

  12. 29-Jul-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  16. 16-Jul-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Part-Heard

    Surepalli Nanda

  18. 01-Jul-2025

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

  19. 01-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Surepalli Nanda

  20. 30-Jun-2025

    Surepalli NandaView PDF

  21. 26-Jun-2025

    Admission

    Surepalli Nanda

  22. 24-Jun-2025

    Admission

    Surepalli Nanda

  23. 02-May-2025

    Admission

    Surepalli Nanda

  24. 01-May-2025

    Admission

    Surepalli Nanda

  25. 13-Sep-2023

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  26. 01-Sep-2023

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  27. 16-Aug-2023

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  28. 04-Jul-2023

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  29. 03-Jul-2023

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  30. 21-Jun-2023

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  31. 14-Jun-2023

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  32. 07-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 06-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14027/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court allowed the writ petition and directed Canara Bank to reconsider its decision setting the pension effective date as 09.02.2023 instead of 24.12.2010 (the date the petitioner originally opted for pension). The court found that the bank failed to comply with its amended clarification order dated 14.12.2022, which explicitly stated pension should be granted "with prospective effect from the date of application made by the petitioner," and directed the bank to reconsider within three weeks while providing the petitioner a personal hearing in accordance with natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case