M/s Haigreeva Infratech Projects Limited. vs Union Bank of India — WP/8964/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Next hearing 15-Apr-2026

CNR: HBHC010186382026

Filing Number

WP/13448/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/8964/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Renuka Yara

Coram

Renuka Yara

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

UNION BANK OF INDIA ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Haigreeva Infratech Projects Limited.

    Adv. PRIYANKA CHOWDHARY

  2. 2.Mr. Jagadeeswarudu Chilukuri

  3. 3.Ms. Radharani Chilukuri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union Bank of India

  2. 2.Union Bank of India

  3. 3.Reserve Bank of India

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    Renuka Yara

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Renuka YaraView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Renuka YaraView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Renuka YaraView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Renuka YaraView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Renuka YaraView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana granted an interim ex-parte stay restraining Union Bank of India from proceeding with a personal hearing scheduled for 25.03.2026, classifying the petitioners' account as fraud, uploading information to RBI's Central Fraud Registry, or furnishing their names to credit information companies, pending disposal of the writ petition. The court found the bank violated RBI Master Directions by not providing the required 21-day notice period before calling for the personal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8964/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana granted an interim ex-parte stay restraining Union Bank of India from proceeding with a personal hearing scheduled for 25.03.2026, classifying the petitioners' account as fraud, uploading information to RBI's Central Fraud Registry, or furnishing their names to credit information companies, pending disposal of the writ petition. The court found the bank violated RBI Master Directions by not providing the required 21-day notice period before calling for the personal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case