LAXMINARAYAN (D) TH:LRS . vs INDORE DEV. AUTHORITY . — C.A. No. 2745 - 2753/2010
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010295212008
Filing Date
13-Oct-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 2745 - 2753/2010
Diary Number
29521/2008
Order Date
17-Mar-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAXMINARAYAN (D) TH:LRS .
Adv. NIRAJ SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDORE DEV. AUTHORITY .
Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SANJAY KAPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROPView PDF
-
23-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
15-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
10-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
23-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2745 - 2753/2010
-
15-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 002745-002753/2010 The Supreme Court allowed appeals by land claimants (Laxminarayan LRS and others) against the Indore Development Authority regarding compensation for land acquired in 1978 for a Sabzi Mandi. The High Court had awarded Rs. 50,000 per acre uniformly; the Court set aside this judgment and remanded to the High Court for reconsideration of market value, directing it to consider the claimants' pending application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and the precedent decision in Yogini (which awarded higher compensation for nearby land acquired four years earlier). The High Court was requested to dispose expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts