MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF DELHI vs KHEM CHAND . — SLP(C) No. 9666/2010

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010195482009

Filing Date

06-Jul-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 9666/2010

Diary Number

19548/2009

Order Date

26-Jul-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF DELHI

    Adv. PRAVEEN SWARUP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHEM CHAND .

    Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-May-2013
  4. 13-Mar-2013
  5. 29-Jan-2013
  6. 04-Dec-2012
  7. 04-Dec-2012
  8. 04-Dec-2012
  9. 11-Oct-2012
  10. 03-Sep-2012
  11. 19-Jul-2012
  12. 03-May-2012
  13. 29-Mar-2012
  14. 14-Feb-2012
  15. 03-Feb-2012
  16. 02-Jan-2012
  17. 25-Nov-2011
  18. 19-Oct-2011
  19. 13-Sep-2011
  20. 12-Aug-2011
  21. 08-Jul-2011
  22. 25-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 16-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 15-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 07-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 22-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 30-Sep-2010
  28. 29-Sep-2010
  29. 17-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 17-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 10-Aug-2010
  32. 27-Jul-2010
  33. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 19-Apr-2010
  35. 29-Mar-2010
  36. 22-Mar-2010
  37. 25-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 19-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 10-Aug-2009
  40. 06-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9666/2010

  41. 04-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 13-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 9666/2010 (Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Khem Chand) On 26/07/2013, the Supreme Court dismissed Municipal Corporation of Delhi's special leave petition challenging the High Court's order dated 22/09/2008. The Court directed the petitioner to implement the High Court's order within six months and clarified that reinstatement of respondents does not arise since they are not in service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case