MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF DELHI vs KHEM CHAND . — SLP(C) No. 9666/2010
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010195482009
Filing Date
06-Jul-2009
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 9666/2010
Diary Number
19548/2009
Order Date
26-Jul-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF DELHI
Adv. PRAVEEN SWARUP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KHEM CHAND .
Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
11-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
14-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9666/2010
-
04-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of SLP(C) No. 9666/2010 (Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Khem Chand) On 26/07/2013, the Supreme Court dismissed Municipal Corporation of Delhi's special leave petition challenging the High Court's order dated 22/09/2008. The Court directed the petitioner to implement the High Court's order within six months and clarified that reinstatement of respondents does not arise since they are not in service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts