STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs VINOD KUMAR GOYAL . — C.A. No. 14475/2024

Case under Land Acquisition and Requisition : Challenge to Land Acquisition, Lapsing of Acquisition, De-reservation, Requisition and De-requisition of Property and Others Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010160332010

Filing Date

14-May-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 14475/2024

Diary Number

16033/2010

Order Date

13-Dec-2024

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition and Requisition : Challenge to land acquisition, lapsing of acquisition, de-reservation, requisition and de-requisition of property and others Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

    Adv. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR GOYAL .

    Adv. S. K. VERMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Dec-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  3. 26-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  4. 12-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  5. 12-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  6. 15-May-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  7. 06-Feb-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  8. 20-Oct-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  9. 19-Oct-2022

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  10. 11-Oct-2022

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala

  11. 13-Feb-2020

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  12. 08-Jan-2020

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  13. 15-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 03-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 03-Mar-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 03-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 24-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 24-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 24-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 11-Jan-2017

    ROPView PDF

  21. 11-Jan-2017

    ROPView PDF

  22. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 28-Oct-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 21-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 21-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 21-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  28. 21-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 21-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  30. 23-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  31. 23-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  32. 31-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 12-Aug-2013

    ROPView PDF

  34. 29-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  35. 16-Oct-2012

    ROPView PDF

  36. 16-Oct-2012

    ROPView PDF

  37. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 29-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 02-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 12-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 12-Jul-2011

    ROPView PDF

  42. 11-May-2011

    ROPView PDF

  43. 03-May-2011

    ROPView PDF

  44. 27-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 31-Mar-2011

    ROPView PDF

  46. 17-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 23-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  48. 17-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 06-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 24-Nov-2010

    ROPView PDF

  51. 16-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 24-Sep-2010

    ROPView PDF

  53. 14-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 06-Aug-2010

    ROPView PDF

  55. 02-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 14-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 14475/2024

  57. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  58. 29-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 08-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. [ 2024 INSC 980 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 14473/2024

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9PDF 10PDF 11PDF 12PDF 13PDF 14PDF 15
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Vinod Kumar Goyal (C.A. No. 014475/2024) The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeals challenging land acquisition proceedings under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement (RUI) Act, 1959, upholding the High Court's quashing of acquisition notifications. The Court found that while procedural defects alone (improper notice service) may not invalidate acquisitions where landowners had actual knowledge, the combined failures—particularly the failure to deposit compensation within mandatory timelines—rendered the acquisitions unlawful and violated Article 300A property rights. Key Holdings: 1. Delay in filing writ petitions: Condoned despite 21+ year delay, as the acquisition process involved glaring procedural irregularities affecting fundamental property rights. 2. Nangli Kota lands: Though improper notice service alone was excused (landowners had participated in proceedings), the acquisition was invalidated because compensation was deposited 10 years late, violating Section 60A(4) of the RUI Act (which mandated deposit within 6 months from August 1, 1987). Possession was also wrongfully transferred before compensation payment, breaching Section 52(7). 3. Moongaska land: Acquisition notification was declared void due to improper notice service that actually prejudiced rights—two of four original landowners never participated or received proper notice. 4. Constitutional principle: Property rights under Article 300A require strict procedural compliance in acquisitions; timely compensation payment is not merely procedural but substantive to ensuring fair expropriation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case