URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST vs VIDHYA DEVI . — C.A. No. 14473/2024

Case under Land Acquisition and Requisition : Challenge to Land Acquisition, Lapsing of Acquisition, De-reservation, Requisition and De-requisition of Property and Others Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010033692010

Filing Date

01-Feb-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 14473/2024

Diary Number

3369/2010

Order Date

13-Dec-2024

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2024 INSC 980

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition and Requisition : Challenge to land acquisition, lapsing of acquisition, de-reservation, requisition and de-requisition of property and others Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST

    Adv. ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] ANKITA CHAUDHARY[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIDHYA DEVI .

    Adv. S. K. VERMA[R-1] NAMITA CHOUDHARY[R-12.3.1] [LR/S]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Dec-2024

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Dec-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Dec-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  5. 26-Jul-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 26-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  7. 12-Jul-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  9. 12-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  10. 15-May-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-May-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  12. 06-Feb-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 06-Feb-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  14. 20-Oct-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 20-Oct-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  16. 19-Oct-2022

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  17. 11-Oct-2022

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala

  18. 13-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-Feb-2020

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  20. 07-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Jan-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 08-Jan-2020

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  23. 15-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 15-Jan-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  25. 30-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 30-Nov-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  27. 23-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 23-Oct-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  29. 06-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 06-Oct-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  31. 21-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 21-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 03-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 03-Mar-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 03-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 24-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 24-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 24-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 11-Jan-2017

    ROPView PDF

  40. 11-Jan-2017

    ROPView PDF

  41. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 28-Oct-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 21-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 21-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 21-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  47. 21-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 21-Sep-2016

    ROPView PDF

  49. 23-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  50. 23-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  51. 31-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 12-Aug-2013

    ROPView PDF

  53. 29-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  54. 16-Oct-2012

    ROPView PDF

  55. 16-Oct-2012

    ROPView PDF

  56. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 29-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  58. 02-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 12-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 12-Jul-2011

    ROPView PDF

  61. 11-May-2011

    ROPView PDF

  62. 03-May-2011

    ROPView PDF

  63. 27-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 31-Mar-2011

    ROPView PDF

  65. 17-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  66. 23-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  67. 17-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  68. 06-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  69. 24-Nov-2010

    ROPView PDF

  70. 16-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  71. 24-Sep-2010

    ROPView PDF

  72. 14-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  73. 06-Aug-2010

    ROPView PDF

  74. 02-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  75. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  76. 29-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  77. 08-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  78. 01-Feb-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 14473/2024

  79. [ 2024 INSC 980 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Urban Improvement Trust v. Vidhya Devi (C.A. 014473/2024) Court Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the Urban Improvement Trust's appeal, upholding the High Court's decision to quash land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1976-1977 under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act for two parcels of land (Nangli Kota and Moongaska). The Court found critical procedural violations that violated property rights under Article 300A. Key Findings: For Nangli Kota land, while improper notice service didn't invalidate the acquisition due to respondents' participation, compensation was unlawfully delayed beyond the six-month statutory deadline (deposited only in 1997 after being vested in 1977), violating constitutional protections. For Moongaska land, improper notice service that prevented two of four original owners from being heard rendered the acquisition notification void. The Court rejected delay-and-laches defenses, emphasizing that compulsory acquisition requires strict procedural compliance to protect fundamental property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case