SARIKA KUMARI vs RAJEEV KUMAR — T.P.(C) No. 572/2011
Case under Section XIV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010144522011
Filing Date
02-May-2011
Registration No
T.P.(C) No. 572/2011
Diary Number
14452/2011
Order Date
22-Jul-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARIKA KUMARI
Adv. SANJAY JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJEEV KUMAR
Adv. ANNAM D. N. RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
17-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
12-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
Case filed
Registration No. T.P.(C) No. 572/2011
Case Summary: T.P.(C) No. 572/2011 - Sarika Kumari v. Rajeev Kumar On July 22, 2013, the Supreme Court disposed of the transfer petitions after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Sarika Kumari and Rajeev Kumar agreed to settle their matrimonial dispute and three related criminal cases through a Memorandum of Agreement: Rajeev Kumar agreed to pay Rs. 40 lakhs (Rs. 20 lakhs paid immediately, balance upon divorce decree) for child maintenance; both parties agreed to withdraw all criminal complaints and cooperate in obtaining mutual consent divorce. The Court quashed all three pending police cases (P.S. Case Nos. 347/2006, 343/2006, and 26/2007) and directed parties to abide by agreement terms while allowing liberty to approach appropriate courts for remaining reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts