SUDERA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. vs PARMANAND AGARWAL . — C.A. No. 5484 - 5485/2000
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010123002000
Filing Date
26-Jul-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 5484 - 5485/2000
Diary Number
12300/2000
Order Date
03-Sep-2003
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUDERA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.
Adv. SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.PARMANAND AGARWAL .
Adv. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5484 - 5485/2000
Case Summary: Sudera Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Parmanand Agarwal (C.A. No. 5484-5485/2000) Hearing Date: September 3, 2003 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of both civil appeals with no order as to costs. The Court declined to decide the merits, noting that interim orders passed previously were pending final determination of fair rent by the Rent Controller. The Court left all contentions open for the High Court to consider in the pending revision petition and original suit. Key Directions: (1) Personal security furnished by three directors of Sudera Enterprises shall remain intact, subject to High Court orders; (2) This security is treated as furnished on behalf of M/s. ABL International (following the company's amalgamation); (3) Interim Applications I.A. Nos. 5-6 for amendment of cause title were allowed; (4) I.A. Nos. 9-18 permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to move before the High Court if necessary; (5) CESC may demand electricity dues as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts