SUDERA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. vs PARMANAND AGARWAL . — C.A. No. 5484 - 5485/2000

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010123002000

Filing Date

26-Jul-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 5484 - 5485/2000

Diary Number

12300/2000

Order Date

03-Sep-2003

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDERA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.

    Adv. SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARMANAND AGARWAL .

    Adv. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 22-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 18-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Oct-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 16-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 19-Jul-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 08-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 10-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 26-Jul-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5484 - 5485/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sudera Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Parmanand Agarwal (C.A. No. 5484-5485/2000) Hearing Date: September 3, 2003 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of both civil appeals with no order as to costs. The Court declined to decide the merits, noting that interim orders passed previously were pending final determination of fair rent by the Rent Controller. The Court left all contentions open for the High Court to consider in the pending revision petition and original suit. Key Directions: (1) Personal security furnished by three directors of Sudera Enterprises shall remain intact, subject to High Court orders; (2) This security is treated as furnished on behalf of M/s. ABL International (following the company's amalgamation); (3) Interim Applications I.A. Nos. 5-6 for amendment of cause title were allowed; (4) I.A. Nos. 9-18 permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to move before the High Court if necessary; (5) CESC may demand electricity dues as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case