CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL SHILLONG vs LALHULIANA — C.A. No. 646/2005
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010035892004
Filing Date
16-Feb-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 646/2005
Diary Number
3589/2004
Order Date
17-Jul-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL SHILLONG
Adv. V. K. VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.LALHULIANA
Adv. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2004
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 646/2005
Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the Chief Postmaster General's appeal challenging a Tribunal order granting respondent employees House Rent Allowance (HRA) and City Compensatory Allowance at par with employees in B-class cities. The Court held that the Tribunal's direction merely required individual consideration of cases in accordance with relevant Office Memoranda and did not warrant interference. The Court clarified that if the Government of India issued fresh instructions after November 13, 1987, respondents' cases shall be considered under those latest instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts