CEHAT . vs UNION OF INDIA . — W.P.(C) No. 301/2000

Case under Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010033622000

Filing Date

22-Feb-2000

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 301/2000

Diary Number

3362/2000

Order Date

10-Sep-2003

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section PIL-W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CEHAT .

    Adv. SANJAY PARIKH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .

    Adv. ASHOK MATHUR V. G. PRAGASAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI SHIV SAGAR TIWARI RADHA SHYAM JENA ANIL SHRIVASTAV V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN JAVED MAHMUD RAO RACHANA SRIVASTAVA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) CORPORATE LAW GROUP KAVEETA WADIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAJESH SRIVASTAVA MANJULA GUPTA AJIT SINGH PUNDIR ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI BHARGAVA V. DESAI DINESH KUMAR GARG GOPAL SINGH GUNTUR PRABHAKAR HEMANTIKA WAHI INDRA SAWHNEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) KAMINI JAISWAL P. N. RAMALINGAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) TARA CHANDRA SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) V. D. KHANNA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAJEEV SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RANJAN MUKHERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Sep-2003

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 29-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-Jan-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Dec-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Sep-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 04-May-2001

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Apr-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Feb-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 301/2000

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court directed Central and State Governments to effectively implement the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, addressing widespread non-compliance since its enactment. The Court issued comprehensive directions requiring appointment of Appropriate Authorities at district/sub-district levels, establishment of Advisory Committees, regular Central Supervisory Board meetings, public awareness campaigns against sex-selective practices, quarterly compliance reporting, and action against unregistered diagnostic centers violating the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case